Search Results for 'stranger things'

Viewing 15 results - 1 through 15 (of 44 total)
  • Author
    Search Results
  • #306189

    The Problem with Starfield and Diablo 4 is Modern Gaming getting worse ? (sorry a long rant lol)
    Am I the only one asking why are modern video games seem to be getting worse, especially when we compare them to games that came out YEARS ago. Starfield VS No Man’s Sky or even Mass Effect. Diablo 4 VS Path Of Exile or even Diablo 2-3.
    There is no reason for massive companies like Blizzard & Bethesda to churn out products like Diablo 4 & Starfield. Diablo 4 is a bit stranger because it started off as a better game that got worse. But many things were always lacking, most notably the Fun factor & power fantasy. Inventory was always a mess that only got worse with Season 1. Then there is the end game, which I covered in previous videos as well. But Starfield is inexcusable. I am glad I played it early before all the geniuses on both sides of the outrage spectrum went full RRRREEEEEEEEEE mode upon full release of the game on Game Pass.

    I knew it was going to happen, because people are stupid all day & every day & love to be outraged. Anyways, Starfield is a MASSIVE game with little to do & is frankly not a great looking game for it’s budget & being a Next Gen Game. No, it’s a passable game with a score of 7/10 from my experience. Exploration is severely limited & I am glad fast travel exists so readily because, you will get bored. It just feels like Fallout but in space. If you’ve ever played games like Mass Effect or No Man’s Sky, you will feel disappointed by the game when you realize that Mass Effect came out over 15 years ago & you can do planetary exploration so much better.

    Then you have a buggy & under developed game that came out in 2016, but was eventually made into a very fun Space Exploration game that you can travel & explore to your hearts content. Sure it launched poorly like Starfield did, but the difference is that it’s an older game & Bethesda could have taken the later development of the game as an example & say “Ok, we have infinitely more money & technology on our hands, let’s give the players a game that will be better than Mass Effect & No Man’s Sky…an independent studio by the way. Instead we got Starefield of NPCs with bland empty worlds you can’t explore. That’s my take on the situation as it is. Thanks for watching.


    Well assuming that the parties are strangers to me — I’ll admit that I used to think that because my generation was taught that it was the job of a man to protect a woman and that no matter what you never hit a woman because a “real man” can take it (i.e. abuse from a woman).

    And now?

    It doesn’t matter who hit first, my first thought is that I’m not getting in the middle of a stranger’s fight because I don’t know what’s the story behind the altercation. That’s not to say I wouldn’t “get involved”…for example I may call the police if things are escalating.

    But no way am I intervening physically. There are too many stories of people who tried to play the hero and ended up getting maimed, arrested or killed and I’d prefer not to be a statistic.


      I once heard this statement in “Unforgiven”. (Clint Eastwood)

      “Its a hell of a thing, killing a man. You take away everything he’s got and everything he’s ever gonna have.”

      Folks need to try to understand, this goes for suicide as well.


      As someone who has had similar thoughts in the distant past and recently dealt with someone who also had them.  If you feel like things are hopeless.  Reach out.  Reach out to anyone.  You would be surprised how many folks, even complete strangers, will help you.


      “If You’re in a Crisis Now
      If you’re in a crisis now, do not hesitate to call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline:

      1-800-273-TALK (8255)
      To chat online with a counselor, click here:
      The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline website:
      For the hearing impaired, contact the Lifeline by TTY at: 1-800-799-4889”


      First: Define morality.   Then: Define religion.

      Morality is based on values, on the idea of a choice between right and wrong. What is an objective definition of values and how do you define right and wrong?
      By what standard can we measure good and evil and define right and wrong?

      Obviously, simple obience to dogma (as demanded by religion) is insufficient. When your god demands obedience to one code and my god demands obedience to another, and then someone else comes along and says “god isn’t real”, you’re stuck.

      So what can we base right and wrong on? How can we objectively define values?
      Let’s start with something simple: material value.

      A diamond is valuable, right? What is the value of a diamond on the moon though?  Nothing, because there is no living being to value it.
      Likewise, if you are crossing the desert and you come across someone who offers you a bottle of water or the biggest diamond on the planet, what do you choose? The water. Because without your life, that diamond is worthless to you.
      Likewise we can observe the same in the animal kingdom. A dung ball is worthless to us, but means everything to the beetle risking its life to roll it across a field.

      The standard of value is that which benefits life. Both material and immaterial. The behaviors humans throughout all cultures value, honesty, kindness, hard work, etc are those which benefit the life of either the individual or the group. The things most cultures agree on are bad: theft, violence, murder, cheating are that which harm life.

      Now of course you can say: “if what benefits life is moral, how about I steal from someone? That benefits my life after all.”  But not so hasty. Human civilization advances through building and creating. Anything that benefits the unproductive at the expense of the productive is immoral, because it harms society and by extension human evolution. By this very reason we can also deduct that the welfare state and redistribution of wealth are morally wrong, and a simple observation of western society confirms this. Since the introduction of the welfare state, not only have virtually all measures of wealth, optimism, family unity and civilization dropped, but for the past 60 years, even the average IQ in western nations has dropped for the first time in history.

      We can measure the morality of a policy by its result. If it benefits life, it is moral.

      Do we need religion for this? No.

      But is it not true that the moral decay of Western civilization has correlated with the loss of religion?  Yes, this is also true. But a correlation does not establish a causal effect.
      If the decline of Christianity was directly responsible for moral decay, non Christian countries would be savage hellholes. And yet, Atheist countries like Japan, Czech Republic, South Korea and others flourish. Hindu India is flourishing and improving as well.

      Focusing on today alone is also shortsighted. Nazi Germany was 96% Christian, with Hitler famously banning all Atheist organizations in his first month in office, confiscating the free thinker society’s headquarters in Berlin and gifting it to the Protestant Church. In 1938 he bragged about having “stamped out the scourge of Atheism”. He repeatedly denied that humans evolved from primates and in Mein Kampf mentions his Christian faith over 130 times. Atheists were banned from the SS (the troops who supervised the concentration camps) and banned from various government jobs. Contrary to American WW2 propaganda (which focused on Himmler and Rosenberg, two Pagans who wanted to replace Christianity with a Germanic religion), Nazi Germany was very much a Christian country. More so than the US at the time.

      I would argue the moral collapse of the West is indeed partially due to the loss of traditional religion. See studies have shown that religiosity is mostly genetic. Most people are genetically religious. No, that doesn’t mean you’re born Christian or Muslim. It means that at some point in human evolution, religiosity proved to be an evolutionary benefit, i.e. when an idea larger than the just the rule of the current alpha male allowed people to form larger groups and gain a head starts on civilization. Religion helped people unify and achieve greater things together. Of course there are other unifying ideas out there like freedom, national pride, racial pride, family, culture etc.  And hence not all people are genetically religious. The full effect of this mutation isn’t understood, but in general it leads to higher trait agreeability and lower trait individualism.
      What it means in practice is a that religious people are more obedient and more eager to believe things without proof. This has been shown again and again in scientific studies with Atheists routinely exhibiting the highest degrees of distrust of strangers. Atheists tend to not be the most social types.

      What happens when a “genetically religious” person is raised without religion as most of today’s youth? They find new religions:  Wokeism, veganism, satanism, feminism, socialism, global warming…    Basically they’ll believe any stupid crap you throw their way. And then they will build a religion around that crap, complete with blasphemy laws, censorship, inquisition and witch trials. They continue to be religious, only worse, because their new religion will be provided by psychopaths on a power trip (the government).

      With all this talk about religion, what is religion really? As stated in the opening post, it provides people a code to live by. All religions do. What religion doesn’t provide is a rational argument for its code or proof of its god being real. Religion – by definition – is an authority system based on belief. Not reason, not logic, not science. Belief. Christianity and Islam specifically single out belief in god as a requirement for not being tortured for eternity. By definition, belief can only exist in the absence of proof. No one “believes” in gravity or the sun, because obviously they’re there. Religion cannot provide proof of god’s existence, because the very notion to do so would render the central moral virtue moot.
      Religion as a system is based entirely on authority. God doesn’t argue with people. He commands. (Except in Buddhism and Judaism to a degree, Buddha actually demanded his followers put his teachings to the test and question everything he said. And Israelite literally means “he who wrestles with god”. Moses famously argued with god). Christianity like most religions demands absolute submission. It’s laws are absolute, and you better not violate them or else!

      On a personal level, the act of submission essentially means adopting someone else’s values for your own. Whether one submits to god or government or the woke mob, it means you’re outsourcing the responsibility of defining morality, and of choosing between right and wrong. You outsource your morality based on either belief or fear.
      Depending on who gives the orders, this can lead you to living a moral life. But absent any proof, you run the risk of being not only wrong, but also serving the wrong people.

      But if you think for yourself, try to define objective values and judge your choices by their impact on your own life and others, that is when you cease to be a drone and acquire objective moral agency.


      I think I’m at the right place, it’s just that what was once normal, now feels a bit underground-ish. You have too look for it in order to find it.

      You type in “top sci fi tv shows” into google and all you find is this new woke sh*t. It’s like older tv shows never existed.

      A few years back I’ve started making a list of TV show’s that I’ve watched and liked. I’ve forgotten some, but here’s my list:


      Breaking Bad

      Criminal Minds





      The Mentalist

      Game of Thrones



      House MD

      Kevin Probably Saves the World


      Pure Genius

      Rick and Morty

      South Park

      The Last Man on Earth


      Black Summer





      Some of the Star Trek shows

      First 2 Stargate shows

      Stranger Things

      Terminator The Sarah Connor Chronicle

      Terra Nova

      The 100

      The X-Files

      The Orville










      Kyle XY

      Sense 8



      All of us are dead

      Sweet Home

      Midnight Mass

      The River

      Squid Game

      The Big Bang Theory

      How I met your Mother


      That 70s Show

      The fresh Prince of Bel-air

      Also there are some anime’s worth watching if you run out of stuff to watch like:

      Death Note


      Samurai Champloo

      Made in Abyss


      Parasyte the Maxim

      Tokyo Ghoul

      Steins Gate

      Attack on Titan




      Grace Randolph review. Can’t believe I’m even posting here. She’s considered kind of a shill for anything, so not sure if you take her reviews seriously. Surprised I could listen to this video because normally, her voice wrecks my ears, so maybe she toned down the pitch.

      I don’t think I’m seeing this one. For some reason, Hollywood decided to put the cast of Stranger Things in everything and I do not find them attractive to look at.


      The Netflix effect is killing a big part of the entertainment industry, fast food entertainment. Quantity over quality. They’ll end up remaking everything and then start making remakes of remakes… and the dumb sheep idiots will keep eating because they already have their brain fucked up, they’re blind.

      i mean, netflix has some cool shit, but it’s like 1 decent show in 500…. no joke. I like Mindhunter (they fucked up the last season thou, got woke)… Stranger Things also got fucked up in the last season… cant think about others, im sure there are, but still… 1 in 500.


      In reply to: The Suicide Squad

      @Hazu Good point about the last Deadpool. After that one, I swore I’d never watch another Deadpool movie. Taika Waititi will keep me away as well, since he is like “virtue-signal: the person.” Everything out of his mouth is cringe. Your comment is funny because Taika Waititi is the same as the kids from Stranger Things. You mentioned Stranger Things and it’s one of those things with me that if they are in something, I avoid it, including the new Kong v Godzilla and the new Ghostbusters that is coming out. It’s like all movies are revolving around the sickly eyesore cast of Stranger Things these day. If they are in, I am out.

      ‘Free Guy’ Review: Ryan Reynolds Stars in a Video Game Version of ‘The Truman Show’ That Plays Itself

      One of the articles mentioned it being like Jumanji.


      In reply to: The Suicide Squad

      @comicsgate, about the movie Free Guy, I hope I’m wrong but I have the feeling is going to be woke af, just like Deadpool 2 and Season 3 of Stranger Things. The cast and the trailers have plenty of red flags lol A bunch of emasculated guys, strong woman power… Humm I dunno… lets see.

      After that last deadpool, i don’t trust ryan lol


      Great lists. I forgot about Altered Carbon. That was really an amazing show until about halfway through. Maybe episode 7 is when it trailed off. Sounds like that is the case with a lot of these shows, actually. Might be like that in movies as well, where the build up is better than the climax. I heard about one called Black Mirror, but never got into it. Watched The Witcher and though Stranger Things was overrated, which is why I avoid things with that cast, like Godzilla or Ghosbusters.

      One show I liked was a Korean show called My Country: A New Age, but it was way too long and just a bit slow, but by about the third episode, I was heavily into it and wondering why Star Wars couldn’t have better writing. The Korean show was about their civil war in the 1300s and had a lot of swords and archery and horses, so it has all the elements of fighting, but it was historical. A General stages a coup against a ruler and the general has like 10 sons by a few wives and all the sons are feuding for power, so there is a lot of fighting and alliances. One part I liked was the Korean madam gets scrolls from all the girls and she archives information that can be used against enemies and she buys and sells the information scrolls just like stocks, so via scroll and quill, she actually wields vast power without any violence or weapons. There is lots and lots of sword fighting and blood and it is shot very well. Stylish.


      They throw billions of dollars around for original content, but most people are probably hard pressed to name a Netflix original from the last 5 years outside of Stranger Things, The Witcher, and Tiger King.


      If you ever want to start a geek war, and for the money its a great form of entertainment, just drop on a random group of geeks the question, “What is the best anime series?” Then just sit back and watch the carnage. Still, after all the fires are been put out and the pocky crumbs vacuumed up, very likely only a few series will be at the top. Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood will likely be one of them, and in many fan’s minds, including my own, it is the top anime series of all time. But there will be some worthy rivals. Very likely, one of those rivals will be Cowboy Bebop, and those who think Bebop is the best do have very good reasons for their opinions.


      Cowboy Bebop was not a series I watched straight through, or watched quickly. It wasn’t always the easiest for me to watch, because it does push some limits that I don’t like pushed, especially when it comes to fan service. And the episodic nature of the series made the overall story feel loose-jointed, introducing characters who seem to be a part of the story only for the sake of one or two actions that help or hinder the main characters in some way, but that’s about it.

      But after finishing it and noting the apparent flaws and things that I wish had been better, I also have to say even as it is, flaws and all, it’s still very good, certainly worthy of its place in any discussion of the best.

      Bebop is an older series, going back to the late 1990s. Unlike a lot of modern series, it’s not about students. Of the four main human characters, Spike, Jet, and Faye are adults. The adults are bounty hunters, which is something like a real job, though they were something different in their pasts before coming together to mostly unsuccessfully hunt down criminals: Jet was a cop, Spike was a gangster, and Faye was a gambler, to badly oversimplify things for each of them.

      The story focusing on older people does give the story a different, more mature feel, with the good and the bad that comes with it. I’ve already said a bit about the bad, the fan service, so I’ll stick more with the good.

      While there is no shortage of humor spread throughout the series, that doesn’t take away from or overrun an overall tone of seriousness and weight. This isn’t the kind of story where bad guys are defeated through the power of friendship; if anything, there are times when the show puts friendship and comradeship to the test, and the results aren’t always all that good. The pieced-together family of the Bebop is not much like the more happy-go-lucky crew of main characters in One Piece; if anything, by the time the series ends this patchwork family is frayed and even already fallen apart. Finally, the strong desire for something doesn’t mean the character will get what he or see desires; if anything, reality tends to mercilessly shoot down the desired place or person.

      So, yes, this isn’t a happy, feel-good story, not even in a Your Lie In April or Violet Evergarden type of way. Watching the last three episodes is to watch the main adult characters have the things they value wrenched away from them, without any numbing agent, except eggs, to help ease their pain. Their pain, or ours as viewers.
      Cowboy Bebop is a series with weight in it, and as it says at the last, we’re gonna carry that weight.

      Perhaps it would be closer to reality to say, we’re already carrying that weight, and Bebop reminds us of that.

      At one point, if I had been asked what I thought the theme of Cowboy Bebop would be, I’d probably have said something like, “You can’t go back”. That idea does appear in many of the episodes, and even appears in some unusual ways. In the episode Gateway Shuffle, for example, the Bebop crew comes up against a group of environmental terrorist who want to stop people from damaging the environment by de-evolving people by turning them into monkeys. The return to the past takes another form in Speak Like A Child, as Jet and Spike have to literally dig into the past to find, and fail to find, a certain piece of technology they need to view a primitive video tape.

      But a few times, “You can’t go back” just doesn’t work. In Asteroid Blues, the first episode, the story isn’t about a character trying to return to her past; instead, she wants to get away from her past, to get to a better place, a place she thinks will give her a better life and a brighter future.

      So, I don’t think I can now say that “You can’t go back” is the show’s theme, though it may point to the theme. Perhaps the show in some way stated its theme in its final words, “You’re gonna carry that weight”. I think I can see how “You’re gonna carry that weight” is shown in the main characters. With Faye, for example, as she learns more about a far-distant past that she had forgotten, we are shown these images of her as a happy, carefree child, a child almost unrecognizable from the jaded  woman she is in the story’s now. You’ll likely see few scenes that more mercilessly show “You’re gonna carry that weight” then the scene where Faye has finally remembered where to find her family’s home, and she’s running toward it, and when she finds it all she sees in a ruin, a desolation, what little remains of a once large and fine house is shattered and broken. For Spike, it plays out more like it did in Asteroid Blues, he wants to find the woman he loved and lost, and together with her move forward, but that’s not how things happened.

      No, we can’t go back. But also, no, we can’t go forward, either. We’re left only with the weight we’re carrying.

      If I were forced to answer the question, “What is your favorite book of the Bible?”, I think I’d have to answer, “Ecclesiastes.” There’s something very down-to-earth about Ecclesiastes. The author views reality through very untinted glasses.

      In Ecclesiastes 2, the author gives us a bit of a rundown of all the things he did:

      4 I made great works. I built houses and planted vineyards for myself. 5 I made myself gardens and parks, and planted in them all kinds of fruit trees. 6 I made myself pools from which to water the forest of growing trees. 7 I bought male and female slaves, and had slaves who were born in my house. I had also great possessions of herds and flocks, more than any who had been before me in Jerusalem. 8 I also gathered for myself silver and gold and the treasure of kings and provinces. I got singers, both men and women, and many concubines, the delight of the sons of man.

      And after all that, his conclusion was:

      11Then I considered all that my hands had done and the toil I had expended in doing it, and behold, all was vanity and striving after wind, and there was nothing to be gained under the sun.

      This grim view of things is found repeatedly throughout Ecclesiastes:

      Ecclesiastes 2
      18I hated all my toil in which I toil under the sun, seeing that I must leave it to the man who will come after me, 19 and who knows whether he will be wise or a fool? Yet he will be master of all for which I toiled and used my wisdom under the sun. This also is vanity. 20 So I turned about and gave my heart up to despair over all the toil of my labors under the sun, 21 because sometimes a person who has toiled with wisdom and knowledge and skill must leave everything to be enjoyed by someone who did not toil for it. This also is vanity and a great evil. 22 What has a man from all the toil and striving of heart with which he toils beneath the sun? 23 For all his days are full of sorrow, and his work is a vexation. Even in the night his heart does not rest. This also is vanity.

      Ecclesiastes 3
      Again I saw all the oppressions that are done under the sun. And behold, the tears of the oppressed, and they had no one to comfort them! On the side of their oppressors there was power, and there was no one to comfort them. 2 And I thought the dead who are already dead more fortunate than the living who are still alive. 3 But better than both is he who has not yet been and has not seen the evil deeds that are done under the sun.

      Ecclesiastes 6
      There is an evil that I have seen under the sun, and it lies heavy on mankind: 2 a man to whom God gives wealth, possessions, and honor, so that he lacks nothing of all that he desires, yet God does not give him power to enjoy them, but a stranger enjoys them. This is vanity; it is a grievous evil.

      Ecclesiastes 9
      11 Again I saw that under the sun the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, nor bread to the wise, nor riches to the intelligent, nor favor to those with knowledge, but time and chance happen to them all. 12 For man does not know his time. Like fish that are taken in an evil net, and like birds that are caught in a snare, so the children of man are snared at an evil time, when it suddenly falls upon them.

      This is the reality we live with, the weight we carry. Life isn’t fair. Bad things happen to good people, and good things happen to bad people. Do your best, and you will very likely still lose. Even if you win, the satisfaction you feel will last only a moment. And, finally, we’re all gonna die, and when that happens, we’re gonna lose what we’ve worked so hard for, because ain’t none of it coming with us.

      I don’t think I’m wrong if I see the well-known phrase from Ecclesiastes, “Vanity of vanities, all is vanity”, as being very close in meaning to “You’re gonna carry that weight”.

      Yet this weight of futility is not the last word.

      Galatians 6
      7 Do not be deceived: God is not mocked, for whatever one sows, that will he also reap. 8 For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap eternal life. 9 And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up. 10 So then, as we have opportunity, let us do good to everyone, and especially to those who are of the household of faith.

      II Timothy 4
      6 For I am already being poured out as a drink offering, and the time of my departure has come. 7 I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith. 8 Henceforth there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will award to me on that day, and not only to me but also to all who have loved his appearing.

      Matthew 10
      40 “Whoever receives you receives me, and whoever receives me receives him who sent me. 41 The one who receives a prophet because he is a prophet will receive a prophet’s reward, and the one who receives a righteous person because he is a righteous person will receive a righteous person’s reward. 42 And whoever gives one of these little ones even a cup of cold water because he is a disciple, truly, I say to you, he will by no means lose his reward.”

      The seeming pessimism of Ecclesiastes must be seen within what is called “the full counsel of the word of God”, so we can see that while the pessimism is very real, it is not the full story. It is right to see our efforts as small and weak, but we must also see our God as great and strong, and yet he sees even our weak efforts and our small works. Our good works are not done in vain, if they are done in faith, if they are not done to win God’s approval but because through Christ we who believe already have God’s approval. Even our smallest works, even if all we can do is give a small bit of refreshment to one of God’s little children, is seen by God and will be rewarded.

      Let me give a few more passages, ones that serve, I think, as both encouragement and warning.

      Luke 18
      9 He also told this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and treated others with contempt: 10 “Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. 11 The Pharisee, standing by himself, prayed thus: ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. 12 I fast twice a week; I give tithes of all that I get.’ 13 But the tax collector, standing far off, would not even lift up his eyes to heaven, but beat his breast, saying, ‘God, be merciful to me, a sinner!’ 14 I tell you, this man went down to his house justified, rather than the other. For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted.”

      Matthew 7
      21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not u prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ 23 And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’

      John 6
      25 When they found him on the other side of the sea, they said to him, “Rabbi, when did you come here?” 26 Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you are seeking me, not because you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves. 27 Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give to you. For on him God the Father has set his seal.” 28 Then they said to him, “What must we do, to be doing the works of God?” 29 Jesus answered them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in him whom he has sent.”

      The parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector is one well worth pondering on. The Pharisee’s prayer was really little more than the man bragging on himself and his good works, while the tax collector’s prayer was him begging God for mercy because he was a sinful man. As the passage tell us, the Pharisee was a man who trusted in himself, he considered himself righteous because of his own good works. Yet Jesus tells us it was the tax collector, the man whose prayer was filled with humility and repentance, that left the temple justified.

      This is shown even more strongly in the brief story about the judgment in Matthew 7. Jesus says that many people will try to point to the great works they did when they lived here on earth, as if those works somehow have earned them a place in the kingdom of heaven. But their great works were actually works of lawlessness, and Jesus will send them away.

      At the risk of becoming trite, I can see how Jesus’ words “Depart from me” are another echo of “You’re gonna carry that weight”, perhaps even the final and ultimate echo of those words. The people sent away are left forever under the weight of their sins, their great deeds shown to be futile, all their efforts judged worthless. They had put their faith in their good works, not in Christ. They had believed in their own works to make them righteous, not in Christ from whom righteousness is a gift.

      Yet that need not be true for any of us. To be like the tax collector, to know that we are sinners, to know that we have nothing to brag about, to know that we need God’s mercy, to humble ourselves before God, is to be justified. To believe in Jesus is to please the Father. To do these things is to at the least begin to have this weight of futility taken from our shoulders, to start to understand that our works in the Lord are not in vain. And even the final crushing weight of death is defeated, losing its sting, because in Christ death is defeated.



      As of late the mainstream media has talked about attacks on random Asian people happening all over.

      I as an Asian person myself am actually scared of this and the big reason for this was what my mother had told me had happened to her recently at a local grocery store.

      My mother told me that when she and my dad were out buying groceries a few weeks ago some young guy that was over 6 ft came up to her and randomly asked her if she was Chinese?

      My mom said nothing and just walked away and by miracle the guy left her alone.

      My mom described the guy who asked her if she was Chinese seemed like he might’ve had some kind of condition that made him seem childlike and he wasn’t all there?

      He apparently was also an employee at the grocery store and if that is true than….why is he allowed to ask a random stranger who was a costumer also about her race like that?

      Most people when meeting new strangers for the first time don’t ask other strangers what their race, sexual orientation or anything else like that is as that is private and personal stuff and also it seems extremely socially awkward along with creepy giving plenty of strangers the wrong signals about that person asking it in public.

      People who ask stuff like that give the impression that they maybe a serial killer, an offender of some kind or they are some kind of person who wants to commit an actual hate crime and with what is being said in the mainstream news numerously about attacks on Asians……my mother and other Asians like myself have a right to be on guard for whatever could come our way in these strange times we live in.

      And with how the mainstream media seems to love to sensationalize and inflate news reports on Asian hate crimes that are going on these days I worry that Asian hate crimes will become like school shootings in how the mainstream media kept sensationalized and over inflating those news headlines along with showing the shooter’s face and talking about his troubled past that lead him to do the terrible deed.

      Because the mainstream media for years kept sensationalizing and inflating school shootings it lead to copy cat shooters over the years and I fear with how the mainstream media treats Asian hate crimes that it might inspire copy cats and one of them could be the guy who asked my mother if she was Chinese at the local grocery store?

      My mom after that meeting with that young man will often bring this up with me as she watches the mainstream news alot that keep speaking about the Asian hate crimes going on and with what happened at the grocery store and I don’t know what to say to calm her down or put her at ease as after hearing her own story about the situation and me knowing how the mainstream media has irresponsibly acted over the past few years…..

      ……things seem uncertain along with scary unpredictable.

      I was thinking about calling up the store to tell management about what my mom went through as she told me the last time she shopped there that creepy guy was still working there and she was afraid to go anywhere in the store where this guy was at.

      Then at the same time I wondered to myself….what if I make a big deal out of nothing as what I hear from my older sister over the years is how my mother has a tendency to exaggerate her claims in life sometimes as she gets overly emotional.

      Also my older sister if you saw a recent posts here on the website that she herself is kinda nuts too in how my older sister flipped out and hit the steering wheel of her car when I brought up Freedom of Speech in a conversation with her?

      So should I trust my easily triggered sister over her claims that my mother might over exaggerate her claims on situations she goes through or should I trust my mom’s story?

      A strange situation

      @Roas I do kinda wish I had half your optimism, friend. I’m not completely blackpilled, but I do think things will get worse before they get better. It’s been almost half a year and the Biden administration is so obviously disastrous, but as long as people can get food on the table and have a roof over their heads, a lot of them are going to continue thinking that none of this affects them and will just go along with whatever narrative is spewed out next. It’s easy to take solace with strangers online and know that you’re not alone, but whenever these discussions crop up IRL and I speak my mind as the voice of dissent, everyone else just tunes out and refuses to engage the matter any further. I’d be lying if I said it wasn’t frustrating.

      You’re making the assumption that people in capitalist occupations are going to have capitalist ideals. You should look up Fabian Socialism, (which is basically British Socialism).

      Rather than overthrowing the current system of government via violent revolution (or just being land-whale cry bullies we’re familiar with), the Fabians are smart, methodical and work towards their Marxist ideals via infiltration and then gradual implementation. And they have zero qualms about using capitalism to get there. If capitalism helps them achieve their goals, then so much, the better. The fact that they view capitalism as evil is a contradiction that doesn’t matter to them. Call out their hypocrisy, and they’ll just laugh in your face (“Yes, we’re using capitalism to reach the top of your societies and then overthrow it. What of it? You’re the ones who think meritocracy is so great, after all.”) Their ultimate goal is some bastardized, hybridization between Communism and hyper-capitalism, creating a slave state from which only they will reap the benefits.

      “Get woke, go broke” is just a libertarian cope. They might not be “SJWs” in the traditional sense, but make no mistake, they’re sympathetic towards the ideology. It doesn’t matter how much of a profit they might lose; they can afford to. They have to bait the opposition into making themselves look like hateful bigots, propagandize to humiliate and demoralize until they can get enough people to repeat the lies and half-truths for themselves, and then it becomes the new normal. Your average normie still doesn’t even know what “woke” is, and doesn’t even realize they’re having their opinions formed for them via media consumption.



      This video I saw on Youtube through suggestions really really disgusts me and after you guys watch the link I will explain why I am disgusted by it:

      If you had seen this video, I shall now explain why I hate this video so much. First off Larry though fictional is completely innocent in this whole video and I have no quarrel with him and feel he deserved none of the shit he went through with that asshole in the video even though all the events in the video were fictional.

      What I do have a quarrel with in this video are both the employee that took the picture of Larry then treated him like crap and posted Larry’s picture on social media calling Larry a loser and the employer of the employee who fired his employee after seeing what the guy did on his social media on his own time.

      First off with the asshole employee, where does this jerk get the idea that he can go into a public place like the restaurant that Larry worked at and treat this poor guy like that?

      What that employee did to Larry at the restaurant is borderline harassment in my own opinion. The employee took Larry’s picture without Larry’s permission and posted it to social media with the caption that Larry was a loser…also without Larry’s permission.

      That asshole by doing that to Larry, violated Larry’s right to privacy in his own life  and that caption put under Larry’s picture was complete slander or even a character assassination that could grab Larry all kinds of unwanted attention from all kinds of creeps and even criminals in real life that would go after him and even kill him depending on their mental state when seeing that online post.

      Not everyone is on social media believe it or not?

      Not everyone wants attention from strangers they don’t know on the street talking about them and they don’t know these strangers or why these strangers are talking about them?

      So by posting a picture of Larry like that without Larry’s permission that asshole caused a security breach issue in Larry’s life.

      Larry should in my opinion have the legal right to sue the employee for both taking a picture of him and posting images of him on social media with untrue captions without his permission for violating Larry’s right to a private life and slander or character assassination of him.

      And now onto the employee’s boss who is in the wrong for looking at what his employee was doing in his free time on social media then firing him over it.

      First off employers don’t own their employees….they employ them meaning their employees aren’t their legal property to do with as they wish whenever they want to which includes their off time from work.

      Their employees take money from their employer to do hired services for the employer…..during the time period that the employer has them in the company building or company online site.

      What the employee does during their off time not in the company building or company online site nor using a company issued social media account, in my opinion is none of the employer’s business nor should the employer have the right to check in on what their employee is doing in their private life off work time.

      It is a breach of freedom of an individual in a free society for their employer being able to spy on them off work time then fire the person what they do when not in the company grounds.

      Employees aren’t slaves and employers shouldn’t think of themselves as slave masters who can control every aspect of their employee’s life even their employee’s personal life even online that includes their own social media account that isn’t company property but property of their employee.

      This makes me think of the Hartley Sawyer (the guy who played Elastic Man on the CW Flash show) situation where the CW fired him after finding offensive posts he put up ten years ago on his own personal social media before he even worked for them.

      Hartley Sawyer at the time doing it didn’t know he would one day be working for the CW back 10 years ago when he made the offensive comments. No one knows what will happen to them in 10 years and that includes Hartley Sawyer and by the CW firing him like that over those 10 year old posts he made….they are trying to say we own you Hartley Sawyer which includes your past.

      Employers shouldn’t hire any employee for their past they should be hiring their employee for their present in that what that employee will do for them today cause they hired that version of the employee for today and not their past self.

      Their employee’s past is the privacy of that employee and only that employee not the fucking employer because you as their employer did not make them like you are some kind of God of creation…….you are their employer who pays them for what they bring to your company for certain hours in the day you have them and that is all.

      I am so sick and so tired of employers who have the arrogance and superiority complex that they have complete and utter power over their employees including their individual lives outside the office.

      If an employer can’t go to their employee’s house during off hours and ask that person to serve them dinner then in my opinion………an employer shouldn’t have a right to see what the employee does in his or her own time online then fire them over it no matter what it is.

      In my opinion the only time an employer should have the right to fire an employee for what they did in their personal life it should be if the employee actually committed a real crime like murder, rape or anything like that during off hours which includes a very very heavy police involvement that after a fair trial with logical and tangible evidence was presented to the court showing that the employee is indeed 100% guilty….then the employer can fire that man or woman from their company for what they did in their off hours.

      If an employer hires an employee, they hire that person to work for them on site and only on site nothing beyond like their home life as most people separate home and work life for a reason which is privacy and employers should respect this privacy instead of playing wannabe dictator.

      Would the employer want their employee to see what they do in their free time which I can bet would be filled with just as many if not more micro aggressions than their own employee and would they want their employee to use these things they found out about their employer to blackmail them to give them a raise?

      I don’t think that is right either and I think both employers and employees shouldn’t be able to look at what the other is doing in their off times to avoid bias in the work relationship.

      How I think this video really should have ended was that Larry sued the employee who shot the picture of him then posted the picture up online with that mean caption without his permission then presented everything that happened to him in court of law then when the verdict was reached that the guy who took the picture of Larry was guilty….and the employer of the guy who took the picture of Larry found out…..the guy who took the picture is legally then fired.

      This way justice is processed logically with tangible evidence and a fair court hearing is done and the employer can fire his employee without getting sued themselves for violating their employee’s privacy and free speech rights because the employer was told by real local authorities that their employee actually is 100% guilty for committing a real crime.

      What do you guys think?




















    Viewing 15 results - 1 through 15 (of 44 total)

    Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!