Leaked Documents Confirm Our Worst Fears About Gender Treatment
Recent leaks from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) have shed light on the disturbing realities of gender treatment, particularly for children. The leaked documents reveal shocking details about the practices and protocols that have been adopted by medical professionals, raising serious concerns about the ethics and long-term consequences of these treatments.
Oh, do tell more.
For years, the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) has been the go-to organization for gender treatment guidelines. However, the leaked documents reveal that WPATH is not the highly qualified medical body it was assumed to be.
Three-quarters of its members are based in the United States, and many are activists who advocate for unrestricted access to gender-confirming treatments for anyone who identifies as trans, including children. Despite its lack of formal authority, WPATH’s standards of care have been widely adopted.
That is like asking for pedos to write the guidelines government must adopt when it comes to minor-attracted-perverts (people)!
The reliance on WPATH’s guidelines has led to a situation where questioning the ethics of these treatments is seen as transphobic and immoral.
Many assumed that WPATH was a professional body of highly qualified medics, but the reality is that anyone can pay a couple of hundred dollars to join the organization. This revelation raises serious questions about the credibility of the guidelines being followed by healthcare providers worldwide.
WTF! Activists, not medical professional, are making the “medical guidelines”? WTF!
The leaked documents from WPATH reveal appalling evidence of the maiming of young bodies in the name of gender treatment. The files contain details of mastectomies with no nipples, incontinence, and even “nullification” – the creation of eunuchs.
Doctors discuss the cancer risks associated with hormones in teenagers and describe operations where a fake vagina is created while the penis is kept intact. These gruesome details paint a disturbing picture of the consequences of these treatments on young, healthy bodies.
Of course. These “people” hate humanity, especially males. So anything to destroy males to them is a must.
One prominent case is that of Jazz Jennings, who was assigned male at birth and put on puberty blockers at the age of 11. Due to insufficient genital material, Jazz’s neovagina was created using the stomach lining, resulting in multiple corrective surgeries and a lifetime of pain.
Jazz’s surgeon, Marci Bowers, admitted that Jazz will never experience an orgasm. This case highlights the dishonesty of telling children that they can change their sex without disclosing the long-term consequences of infertility and lack of sexual function.
Misinformation by omission of details. And as a youth, most most likely don’t have the maturity or understanding to ask questions their “provider” would not otherwise tell them.
The focus on gender dysphoria has led to the neglect of underlying psychological issues in some patients. The case of Scarlett Blake, a murderer and former GIDS patient who had also tortured a cat, highlights the potential consequences of ignoring deeper psychological issues in favor of gender treatment.
Realizing that some of these children have deep psychological issues but ignoring them in pursuit of gender-affirming care is a form of malpractice. It is crucial to address these underlying issues and provide comprehensive mental health support.
It was also reported elsewhere, that IIRC 90-95% of these youth grow-out of these feelings. But the rush to start them onto drugs and body mutilations and a life of needing drugs and further surgeries…
Activists have propagated the idea that “gender-affirming care” is lifesaving, but the leaked documents suggest otherwise. The long-term effects of these treatments are largely unknown, and while some adults who transition may experience increased happiness, not all do.
The NHS and many other European countries have backed away from using puberty blockers and this gross experimentation on children. The lack of knowledge about the long-term effects of these treatments should be a cause for concern and caution.
Lifesaving for 1-2% ?, while destroying the other 98-99%?
The leak also reveals that WPATH’s latest standards of care suggest puberty blockers can be given at any age and that some boys may identify as “eunuch individuals,” potentially requiring surgical intervention. This information is not widely known within the general medical community.
The idea of castrating boys as a form of gender-affirming care goes against the fundamental principle of “Do No Harm” in medicine. It is deeply disturbing that such practices are being considered and promoted by an organization like WPATH.
These activists are male haters, IMO. Removing as many males from the gene pool as they can, be it surgical transition to a female form or as in the case with creating “eunuch individuals”, the complete with the removal of the male reproductive organs (nuts) in either case.
The leaked documents demonstrate that the preferred guidance advises the removal of healthy tissue from young bodies, disregarding the potential complications.
This practice should not be called medicine; it is mutilation. We must acknowledge the truth about these treatments and their consequences. We must create a space for open and honest discussions about gender dysphoria and its treatment, free from the fear of being labeled as transphobic.
The adults and the medical professional need to step up! Science and facts before activists and their misinformation.
The leaked documents also reveal that there is money to be made from the deep distress experienced by individuals with gender dysphoria. Medical insurance companies are willing to pay for some of these treatments, creating a financial incentive for their promotion.
This raises questions about the motivations behind the push for gender-affirming care and whether the well-being of patients is truly the primary concern. It is essential to examine the role of financial interests in shaping the narrative around gender treatment.
Yay, if 90-95% of the people grow out of these “feelings”, the need for expensive lifetime of surgeries and drugs is gone from the equation.
The care of our most vulnerable and disturbed children cannot be left in the hands of organizations like WPATH, which prioritize activism over medical ethics. We must provide comprehensive psychological support to these individuals and address their underlying mental health issues.
Rushing children into irreversible treatments with lifelong consequences is not the answer. We must prioritize their long-term well-being and ensure that they receive the support and care they need to navigate their distress and find genuine healing.
But there is not as much MONEY to be made that way. But what do you expect from people who care more for money/profits than to address/solve the underlying issues.
Ignoring the truth about the realities of gender treatment can have devastating consequences. The stories of detransitioners who regret their decisions and are left with irreversible physical changes and emotional scars are a testament to the need for caution and honesty.
We cannot continue to prioritize political correctness over the well-being of individuals, especially children. It is time to have an open and honest conversation about the risks and limitations of gender-affirming care and to explore alternative approaches that prioritize mental health and long-term outcomes.
It would also help if the legacy media stops burying stories and issues about detransitioner and detransitioning.
The leaked documents from WPATH underscore the need for evidence-based medicine in the field of gender treatment. We cannot rely on the guidelines of an organization that is heavily influenced by activism and lacks rigorous scientific backing.
Activists are NOT medical professionals. WPATH should mean “Worst-PATH” a confused youth should be unfortunate to take.
The WPATH leaks serve as a wake-up call for society. We cannot continue to allow the mutilation of young bodies under the guise of gender-affirming care. It is time for medical professionals, parents, and policymakers to come together and re-evaluate the current approach to treating gender dysphoria in children.
We must prioritize the long-term well-being of these children, ensuring that they receive comprehensive psychological support and are not rushed into irreversible treatments with lifelong consequences. Only by facing the truth and engaging in open, evidence-based discussions can we hope to protect the most vulnerable among us and prevent further harm.
EXACTLY!
We must create a space for open dialogue, where the voices of detransitioners and concerned professionals can be heard without fear of retribution. We must prioritize evidence-based approaches and invest in research to better understand the long-term consequences of these treatments. Most importantly, we must put the welfare of children first and ensure that they receive the support and care they need to navigate their distress and find genuine healing. Only by working together can we hope to build a future where the well-being of all individuals, regardless of their gender identity, is protected and upheld.
Sadly, that is exactly what these activists DON’T want. For then their lies and deception will be seen by all.
As old as some of you are, I am sure everyone at some point has heard of Bomberman. Whether you played back on the on Super Nintendo (some cases, NES) or later on Gameboy Advance or GameCube or even the Xbox and PS3, Bomberman has withstood the test of time. Although Hudson Software (the original developers) was bought out by Konami, Bomberman has surprisingly lived on and to no surprise, Bomberman is back and better than ever and has been back since 2017 around the release of the switch.
But what is Bomberman? He’s a fun robot that blasts blocks. While his objectives has went from reaching the surface to become a real boy to return in Lode Runner or in other cases he’s battling with an evil scientist or his black counterpart. In any case, Bomberman has no consistency with his stories and you could say each video game is its own universe and canon shifts based on which game you play.
I personally believe this is what kept Bomberman fresh for so long. You never have to play the games in chronological order, you can just pick up a game and play. Sure, some of Bomberman’s more iconic characters or references are lost to time or with HudsonSoft’s buyout, but the spirit of the Bomberman franchise will never truly end (or at least I hope).
With the newest iteration of Bomberman R (R standing for Reborn or Renewed) we see each Bomberman who had their own color now has their own look and personality to match which is new and actually is both refreshing and humorous. Bomberman has encompasses both goofy and serious moments, these characters feel like they’re straight out of an anime and I love every bit of it.
White bomber is obviously the Leader and older brother, Black bomber surprisingly turns into Mr. suave, blue bomber the sleepiest robot I’ve ever seen, green bomber whose the baby brother with sneaky tendencies, yellow bomber is the carefree goofball, Red is the bomb happy burning passion of Fighting, Pink is the sweeter big sister, and Aqua is the quiet younger sister, and together they are the 8 bomber brothers with the exception of Karaoke Bomber whom I think is the original Pink bomber who was originally a character named Honey who had a looong history in Bomberman.
Well anyways, this new iteration started in 2017 with Super Bomberman R and spoilers ahead: the return to the basics with the original evil scientist to fight Bomberman, Buggler (Bagura in Japan) who wants to take over the galaxy with Robots he reprogrammed. The held traditional 5 stages with 8 levels and a boss, truly traditional Bomberman.
And of course after Super Bomberman R Online came and went (no one paid for the micropay BS)
And 6 years after Super Bomberman R, we come to the sequel of Super Bomber R 2 which is honestly one of the best direct sequels to a game I have ever played.
In this game, we are introduced to a new villain, Fusell and his minions known as The Lugion. A villain spanking across galaxies to collect creatures known as the Ellon for sinister purposes. The Bomberman brothers (that’s what they’re called now) come across the Ellon, baby like energy entities with the power energize equipment for various purposes. As cute as they are, they are definitely a handful as Fusell seeks to capture the Ellon while encountering the sinister looking creatures called The Lugion. This is where the story begins.
This game is very different from other bomberman games where normally the objective was to defeat enemies in 8 round with a boss, now you’re traveling across three long stages to collect 100 Ellon in each stage and battling Lugion in Base defense and base infiltration. An entirely new concept for bomberman which is surprisingly intuitive and challenging but ultimately a FUN CONCEPT!
I’m sure there are people who love or hate tower defense, but when applied to a series like bomberman, it is surprisingly intuitive and almost a match made in heaven. I have fun building defense stages and I get to infiltrate stages of the Lugion (and online as well). The rest of the story is you travelling across 3 planets with around 10-14 areas to explore and level up 15 levels for each planet all to battle a final boss on each level with a 4th and final boss which is Fusell.
How to play: if you played one bomberman game, you’ve played them all. You bomb blocks to create paths and kill enemies, but you also have to place and move before the bomb explodes because your bombs can hurt you. The game works kind of like a puzzle. You bomb blocks to create paths, find power ups and use your bomb powers to blast your opponents with various techniques to block your enemies and blow them up.
The game comes to a satisfying conclusion and actually the story carries some seriousness and moral questions in the story. Upon completion, you’ll find a surprise, a surprise that most games no longer offer: UNLOCKABLES. Unlockable characters with no extra cost, unlockable items with no additional cost, a bunch of in game only currency that requires NONE OF YOUR ACTUAL MONEY TO RECEIVE?! I THINK KONAMI FINALLY LEARNED WE DON’T LIKE MICROPAY?!?!
Hell has frozen over, A big corporate company has finally learned that forcing micropay into our games won’t make us buy them! That’s right. All the in game unlockable don’t require extra money. Just you playing the game.
It’s so refreshing to see this in this day and age. To think something we used to take for granted as kids is now making a fantastic return. Christmas came early boys.
Sure, this may not be the rarest sight, but it’s still very nice to see. Ultimately Bomberman R 2 has brought us everything we like about bomberman and more and I hope we keep seeing more games like this make it to the US. Maybe even the “Bombergirl” game 😳 (I hope and yes, you should look up the Bombergirl game, it’s the kind of game that makes woke Twitter freaks cry).
Whelp, hope you like my review, it’s not everything I wanted to write, and I’m leaving details out like Konami’s bomberman crossover characters like Solid Snake or Simon Belmont, but I wanted to leave it at this and say, Go play bomberman! I would like to contribute to G+G but that’s a bit of a pipedream for me. I just love to write about video games I play and hope people read my reviews and get excited to play them. 8/10 for this game. If you love Bomberman or just want a fun game, pick it up!
As old as some of you are, I am sure everyone at some point has heard of Bomberman. Whether you played back on the on Super Nintendo (some cases, NES) or later on Gameboy Advance or GameCube or even the Xbox and PS3, Bomberman has withstood the test of time. Although Hudson Software (the original developers) was bought out by Konami, Bomberman has surprisingly lived on and to no surprise, Bomberman is back and better than ever and has been back since 2017 around the release of the switch.
But what is Bomberman? He’s a fun robot that blasts blocks. While his objectives has went from reaching the surface to become a real boy to return in Lode Runner or in other cases he’s battling with an evil scientist or his black counterpart. In any case, Bomberman has no consistency with his stories and you could say each video game is its own universe and canon shifts based on which game you play.
I personally believe this is what kept Bomberman fresh for so long. You never have to play the games in chronological order, you can just pick up a game and play. Sure, some of Bomberman’s more iconic characters or references are lost to time or with HudsonSoft’s buyout, but the spirit of the Bomberman franchise will never truly end (or at least I hope).
With the newest iteration of Bomberman R (R standing for Reborn or Renewed) we see each Bomberman who had their own color now has their own look and personality to match which is new and actually is both refreshing and humorous. Bomberman has encompasses both goofy and serious moments, these characters feel like they’re straight out of an anime and I love every bit of it.
White bomber is obviously the Leader and older brother, Black bomber surprisingly turns into Mr. suave, blue bomber the sleepiest robot I’ve ever seen, green bomber whose the baby brother with sneaky tendencies, yellow bomber is the carefree goofball, Red is the bomb happy burning passion of Fighting, Pink is the sweeter big sister, and Aqua is the quiet younger sister, and together they are the 8 bomber brothers with the exception of Karaoke Bomber whom I think is the original Pink bomber who was originally a character named Honey who had a looong history in Bomberman.
Well anyways, this new iteration started in 2017 with Super Bomberman R and spoilers ahead: the return to the basics with the original evil scientist to fight Bomberman, Buggler (Bagura in Japan) who wants to take over the galaxy with Robots he reprogrammed. The held traditional 5 stages with 8 levels and a boss, truly traditional Bomberman.
And of course after Super Bomberman R Online came and went (no one paid for the micropay BS)
And 6 years after Super Bomberman R, we come to the sequel of Super Bomber R 2 which is honestly one of the best direct sequels to a game I have ever played.
In this game, we are introduced to a new villain, Fusell and his minions known as The Lugion. A villain spanking across galaxies to collect creatures known as the Ellon for sinister purposes. The Bomberman brothers (that’s what they’re called now) come across the Ellon, baby like energy entities with the power energize equipment for various purposes. As cute as they are, they are definitely a handful as Fusell seeks to capture the Ellon while encountering the sinister looking creatures called The Lugion. This is where the story begins.
This game is very different from other bomberman games where normally the objective was to defeat enemies in 8 round with a boss, now you’re traveling across three long stages to collect 100 Ellon in each stage and battling Lugion in Base defense and base infiltration. An entirely new concept for bomberman which is surprisingly intuitive and challenging but ultimately a FUN CONCEPT!
I’m sure there are people who love or hate tower defense, but when applied to a series like bomberman, it is surprisingly intuitive and almost a match made in heaven. I have fun building defense stages and I get to infiltrate stages of the Lugion (and online as well). The rest of the story is you travelling across 3 planets with around 10-14 areas to explore and level up 15 levels for each planet all to battle a final boss on each level with a 4th and final boss which is Fusell.
How to play: if you played one bomberman game, you’ve played them all. You bomb blocks to create paths and kill enemies, but you also have to place and move before the bomb explodes because your bombs can hurt you. The game works kind of like a puzzle. You bomb blocks to create paths, find power ups and use your bomb powers to blast your opponents with various techniques to block your enemies and blow them up.
The game comes to a satisfying conclusion and actually the story carries some seriousness and moral questions in the story. Upon completion, you’ll find a surprise, a surprise that most games no longer offer: UNLOCKABLES. Unlockable characters with no extra cost, unlockable items with no additional cost, a bunch of in game only currency that requires NONE OF YOUR ACTUAL MONEY TO RECEIVE?! I THINK KONAMI FINALLY LEARNED WE DON’T LIKE MICROPAY?!?!
Hell has frozen over, A big corporate company has finally learned that forcing micropay into our games won’t make us buy them! That’s right. All the in game unlockable don’t require extra money. Just you playing the game.
It’s so refreshing to see this in this day and age. To think something we used to take for granted as kids is now making a fantastic return. Christmas came early boys.
Sure, this may not be the rarest sight, but it’s still very nice to see. Ultimately Bomberman R 2 has brought us everything we like about bomberman and more and I hope we keep seeing more games like this make it to the US. Maybe even the “Bombergirl” game 😳 (I hope and yes, you should look up the Bombergirl game, it’s the kind of game that makes woke Twitter freaks cry).
Whelp, hope you like my review, it’s not everything I wanted to write, and I’m leaving details out like Konami’s bomberman crossover characters like Solid Snake or Simon Belmont, but I wanted to leave it at this and say, Go play bomberman! I would like to contribute to G+G but that’s a bit of a pipedream for me. I just love to write about video games I play and hope people read my reviews and get excited to play them. 8/10 for this game. If you love Bomberman or just want a fun game, pick it up!
For anyone interested, the book can be found here and a video of someone reading the book can be found here.
This isn’t so much a book review as it is an attempt to try to understand what Lewis was writing, and to see how what he wrote may be playing out now.
One thing Lewis tries to establish early on is that there is a universal code of morals and ethics. It is universal because almost all aspects of it are found across all human cultures in all times. “This conception in all its forms, Platonic, Aristotelian, Stoic, Christian, and Oriental alike, I shall henceforth refer to for brevity simply as ‘the Tao’.” (p. 8).
The existence of this code is of primary importance to humanity. “The head rules the belly through the chest—the seat, as Alanus tells us, of Magnanimity, of emotions organized by trained habit into stable sentiments. The Chest-Magnanimity-Sentiment—these are the indispensable liaison officers between cerebral man and visceral man. It may even be said that it is by this middle element that man is man: for by his intellect he is mere spirit and by his appetite mere animal.” (p. 11).
To take away this code would be to create what Lewis calls “Men Without Chests”. “And all the time—such is the tragi-comedy of our situation—we continue to clamour for those very qualities we are rendering impossible. You can hardly open a periodical without coming across the statement that what our civilization needs is more ‘drive’, or dynamism, or self-sacrifice, or ‘creativity’. In a sort of ghastly simplicity we remove the organ and demand the function. We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and bid the geldings be fruitful.” (p. 12).
Is this something we can see with our own eyes, the effects of this void between our heads and our stomachs, between our minds and our appetites? I can think of the recent outbreak of mass robberies in certain cities, where large crowds of people rush into stores, steal in an almost haphazard manner whatever is at hand, then leave. And when the businesses shut down and leave for better, safer places, they will cry that their neighborhoods are being abandoned by those greedy businesses.
It could even be that the whole of what we called “cancel culture” is an example of this void. For most of those who participate in cancelings, it seems to be less about intellect, about the give-and-take of ideas and only shutting the doors to truly heinous ideas, but about silencing any idea that they find troubling, or that simply disagrees with them. They are simply obeying their own desires, their own emotions, their own appetites., and have given no thought to the idea that the same rules they want to use against others could very well also be used against them.
Or the recent examples of transgender madness, or people intentionally exposes young children to sexually charged drag shows, or the insanity during the time of Covid over things that we now know were useless and even lies,. I’m sure other people can add to the list of things that show how as a whole our minds and our appetites have been separated, how our culture is being pushed around by people who are ruled by their appetites and not ruling their emotions by their minds.
Lewis gives us a possible scenario of how things may finally play out. “At the moment, then, of Man’s victory over Nature, we find the whole human race subjected to some individual men, and those individuals subjected to that in themselves which is purely ‘natural’—to their irrational impulses. Nature, untrammelled by values, rules the Conditioners and, through them, all humanity. Man’s conquest of Nature turns out, in the moment of its consummation, to be Nature’s conquest of Man. Every victory we seemed to win has led us, step by step, to this conclusion. All Nature’s apparent reverses have been but tactical withdrawals. We thought we were beating her back when she was luring us on. What looked to us like hands held up in surrender was really the opening of arms to enfold us for ever. If the fully planned and conditioned world (with its Tao a mere product of the planning) comes into existence, Nature will be troubled no more by the restive species that rose in revolt against her so many millions of years ago, will be vexed no longer by its chatter of truth and mercy and beauty and happiness. Ferum victorem cepit: and if the eugenics are efficient enough there will be no second revolt, but all snug beneath the Conditioners, and the Conditioners beneath her, till the moon falls or the sun grows cold.” (pp. 31-32).
“Traditional values are to be ‘debunked’ and mankind to be cut out into some fresh shape at the will (which must, by hypothesis, be an arbitrary will) of some few lucky people in one lucky generation which has learned how to do it. The belief that we can invent ‘ideologies’ at pleasure, and the consequent treatment of mankind as mere ulh, specimens, preparations, begins to affect our very language. Once we killed bad men: now we liquidate unsocial elements. Virtue has become integration and diligence dynamism, and boys likely to be worthy of a commission are ‘potential officer material’. Most wonderful of all, the virtues of thrift and temperance, and even of ordinary intelligence, are sales-resistance.” (p. 34).
What we are left with is a vast herd of sheep called humanity who are ruled by some few who through education will not train us in how to think but will tell us what to think. They will not believe in a code themselves, but they will force a code upon all the sheep below them.
Yet since they themselves have no code, what code can these dear leaders force upon us? Only what is convenient for them. They have no code that tells them to care one whit for the sheep, except perhaps insofar as happy sheep make for happy shepherds. But the rules they make for the sheep will not be rules they intend to keep themselves.
Consider the climate fearmongers. In words, they are very ready to make dire predictions, and in actions, they are very ready to make the lives of the sheep very difficult. But in their actions regarding themselves, they are very ready to ignore their own rules. When they gave for their conferences, they come on their private jets with the vast entourages of people and armadas of vehicles. Their homes are examples of energy waste.
If I could offer one counterpoint, it’s not as if such hypocrisy is new. Jesus denounced the religious rulers of His day for putting burdens of the people that the rulers themselves would not touch.