Appellate court rules in favor of separating school bathrooms based on sex

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #290443

    Appellate court rules in favor of separating school bathrooms based on sex

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled that separating bathrooms based on sex doesn’t violate the Constitution or Title IX…

    That sounds like common sense.

    The case, Adams v. Sch. Bd. of St. Johns Cty, revolved around whether or not St. Johns County School Board in Florida violated a transgender student’s rights by prohibiting the student, a biological female who identifies as a boy, from using the boys’ bathroom at Allen D. Nease High School.

    A biological female should use the female’s bathrooms/changerooms.

    A biological male should use the male’s bathrooms/changerooms.

    The court ruled en banc that the United States has a long tradition of segregating certain spaces, such as bathrooms, on the basis of sex, without falling afoul of either the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment or Title IX, which prohibits sex-based discrimination in education. As such, the student’s rights weren’t violated.

    Finally!  A ruling based on law, traditional common law, and the constitution.

    And not only that, but…

    In arguing that the school didn’t violate the rights of transgender students, the court documented the school’s many attempts to accommodate LGBT students.

    You can accommodate them without making other students (the vast majority) to feel uncomfortable/unable to use the washrooms/changerooms because someone of the opposite biological sex is/might be in those “safe spaces”.  Including gender “neutral” bathrooms.

    We are hearing more and more stories how “unsafe” those spaces have become in recent years.

     

    #290444
    Mustangride1
    Moderator

      Common Sense in 2022, say it aint so Brother Legatus.

      #290445
      Vknid
      Moderator

        The sad part is now a days, to arrive at common sense it takes research, studies and a court case etc. We are so smart we are dumb.

        #290471

        Another grand victory for conservatives. Sure to set back the communist takeover. Oh wait…

        #290485
        DarthVengeant
        Premium

          Historically there has been women and men bathrooms for a long time, but now all the sudden we need a court ruling to do it because of the people who set online living in a fantasy world making up rules as they go.

          #290496

          Good ruling but expect more of these types of lawsuits…an unfortunate consequence of normalizing mental illness.

           

          #291536

          Catholic diocese bans preferred pronouns and nixes woke bathroom agenda

          The Diocese of Des Moines in Iowa is being lauded after it banned the use of preferred pronouns in schools and churches and mandated that worshipers must use the bathrooms affiliated with their gender assigned at birth.

          HORRAY!

          These definitive steps in the war on woke culture took effect Monday, according to a report, and they are set to affect around 17 schools and 80 parishes in Iowa.

          It is a start.

          A spokesperson for the diocese, which is responsible for at least four hospitals, detailed that the decision for the new rules stems from a “lengthy process” aimed at addressing concerns relating to students’ gender identity, the report noted.

          As in a male is a male, a female is a female, and both needs to use the bathrooms of their biological sex, and to use the appropriate pronouns of said sex.

          “This is not what Jesus would do,” Democratic State Sen. Claire Celsi said, per the report.

          And you know what Jesus would say…

          John 8:1-30 NIV

          The story of a woman caught in adultery was brought before Jesus.

          …They made her stand before the group 4 and said to Jesus, “Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. 5 In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?

          Jesus replied that anyone without sin to throw the first stone.

          Everyone left, one by one, till only Jesus and the Adultress was left, and here is what Jesus said, and what he would say to those people.

          10 Jesus straightened up and asked her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?”

          11 “No one, sir,” she said.

          “Then neither do I condemn you,” Jesus declared. “Go now and leave your life of sin.”

          Leave your life of SIN!

          That, Democratic State Sen. Claire Celsi, is exactly what Jesus would have said to those people.

          Jesus would NOT say to continue to SIN, not to continue to due what is evil and sinful in God’s eyes.

          #292203

          Republicans introduced a bill to ban students who identify as animals from public schools

          “A board of a school district, a public or private school, or a teacher in a public or private school may not … Adopt a policy establishing or providing a place, facility, school program, or accommodation that caters to a student’s perception of being any animal species other than human,” a section of the bill, introduced Wednesday by six Republican members of the North Dakota Legislature, reads.

          That fact we need such legislation shows how deluded the extremely toxic far alt-leftoids are becoming.

          Oh, you don’t need such laws…. until you do… but by then just accept the insanity as the new normal.

          No thanks!

           

        Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

        Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!

        SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!

        NAVIGATION