Bill C-10 must be stopped In Canada

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #220598

     

    As someone from up north of the USA, this C-10 Bill that the Government wants to put out really really worries me. The C-10 Bill for those of you who don’t know what I am talking about is a new bill that the current Canadian Liberal Government wants to push into law where the Canadian government will have the power to regulate the internet deciding what Canadians can post online whether it is video uploads, photos and even comments.

    If what is posted on social media like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Youtube by users don’t pass the Canadian code of what is acceptable or unacceptable under the new C-10 Bill then the Canadian Government will contact these social media companies and tell them that they will have 24 hours to bring the post down of that user or the platform will face legal financial consequences.

    Here are some videos to describe better what I am talking about:

    To me as a Canadian this seems like an infringement on my and everyone in Canada’s right to express ourselves under the Freedom of Expression Act in Canada.

    For the government to start regulating what people in Canada can and can’t say online is only going to lead Canada down a very very dark path of totalitarianism and not the free country so many immigrants fled to over the many decades and centuries to avoid persecution and authoritarianism in their original country.

    This C-10 Bill if passed would go against everything Canada stood for as a country that valued equality, freedom, democracy, choice, acceptance of all groups from all walks of life, individualism and a right to happiness.

    So I urge all my fellow Canadians to spread the word of the dangers of Bill C-10 and start a conversation with everyone they know in their life to help the population know what the bill is really about and maybe ask their local politicians or public representatives about it and hold these public servants accountable for any malicious intent that Bill C-10 may pose to the population if made into law.

    My fellow Canadians don’t just look on at only bad politics in the USA, you all have a duty as a citizen of Canada to look on at your own country’s bad politics also as they will affect you more locally than the politics of the USA.

    We Canadians must get our own home in order first like all of us looking into the dangers of Bill C-10 before we point the finger at the USA for anything they do in their own country that won’t affect us locally.

    We need to put on our airplane oxygen mask first before securing the oxygen mask on person next to us.

    I implore all Canadian Fandom Menace Youtubers like Krista Novva and friends of the Fandom Menace like Star Wars Theory who live in this land up North who upload videos to Youtube or use Twitter to talk to their friends from across the world to tell their many followers who might be Canadian like them to start the conversation on Bill C-10 to get the population to hold the Canadian Government responsible for any dangers that may arise from Bill C-10 to hopefully either stop it or get the government to change it to be more fair to the population in this internet age.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    #220599
    Mustangride1
    Moderator

      It would actually go against the Canadian Constitution “rights and freedoms” section 2 –

      2 Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

      (a) freedom of conscience and religion;
      (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
      (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
      (d) freedom of association.

      It is like all the idiots who try to infringe on the First Amendment here… They do it for the BASE and know it would never pass Constitutional challenges. But they get the votes because the their base is so ignorant of how Con-law works. Then they get mad because the Constitution told them piss off. Its all politics man.

      #220600

      @Mustangride1

      Crazy and scary times both our countries live in, people just can’t understand the importance of speech and why it needs to stay free for not just them but future generations. Free Speech is like costumer service for Walmart, without it costumers of Walmart would just have costumers with broken items they bought thinking it wasn’t broken and the costumers would never be happy.

      Then as a result the costumers would go shop somewhere else and Walmart would go out of business for not listening to costumers and replacing the costumer’s broken item.

      #220603
      Mustangride1
      Moderator

        It is not as scary as many make it out, there are all kinds of laws and protections. It requires enforcement and or Challenges. I am not worried about Constitutional issues right now. I am worried about how much debt this current crop of idiots in DC are going to cost my Great Great Great Grandkids.

        People just do not understand Con-law, if you listen to lawyers that do, you quickly find out just how next to impossible it is to change it. The problem is the time challenges take to go through the courts. I told people from day 1 that Gay rights “Obergefell vs. Hodges “were covered under the 14th amendment at bare minimum, got called all kinds of names, when it passed I reminded each and every one of them. Flat out told them Your Opinion, My Opinion the Green men watching us Opinion did not matter. All that mattered was the law, and I was glad to see it happen. Because now the 14th can be used for even Gun rights as the finding was based not so much on the actual rights but the reciprocity of the license.

        Now the courts have a 2a case coming before them and if the Lawyers for it are smart they will use “Obergefell vs. Hodges ” as they did in Kim Davis in Kentucky when she refused the Gay couple a license. See now there is direct case law and precedence from SCOTUS itself to use. Amazing how that document works when it is applied as intended “Blindly”.

        #227642

        Update:

        Liberals, Bloc vote to end Bill C-10 study amid social media free speech concerns

        Government MPs backed a push to impose time allocation on the heritage committee’s study of the bill, meaning the committee will now get no more than five more hours to study the bill before being cut off.

        So they don’t want a discussion on the controversial bill?

        That in itself says this bill NEEDS to be looked at more closely.

        Conservatives have argued the bill poses serious problems and goes too far in regulating social media, and say more time is needed to study the effects the bill would have on Canadian content creators.

        Right now, that is a big UNKNOWN!

        The proposed law hopes to extend Canadian content requirements to these online platforms, ensuring the companies pay into cultural funds and display a certain amount of Canadian content.

        Hopes?

        You mean to say they don’t know at all? ! ?

        Bill C-10 became a source of parliamentary discord after the Liberals removed a section of the bill that protected user-generated content and exempted it from regulation. That meant Canadians’ Facebook and Instagram posts could be forced to abide by certain CRTC rules.

        And while it’ll be up to the CRTC to draft exactly what those regulations might look like, experts have warned this could allow the CRTC to regulate anything they’d like on social media.

        So in the end, a non-elected bureaucracy will make the actual RULES on social media platforms.

        This bill will allow the CRTC to censor as it sees fit, without elected officials input.  And could be easily used to justify BANS of individuals off those platforms by the tech giants.

        Exactly what the corrupt liberals want.

        #228896

        OH look at what they tried to do!

        Bill C-10 hits speed bump as Speaker voids dozens of ‘secret’ amendments

        The Liberal government’s push to speed controversial broadcasting bill C-10 through Parliament hit a road bump Tuesday, when the Speaker of the House voided dozens of amendments to the bill.

        Why?  What was so unusual about those amendments?

        The Heritage committee voted on those amendments last week, without debate or the ability to consult experts. The unusual process, in which the public wasn’t aware of what MPs were voting on until days later, was criticized as “secret”…

        WTF!

        The amendments were made public Monday when the amended bill was tabled in the House of Commons. Conservative MP Blake Richards asked the Speaker of the House to strike those amendments, arguing the committee exceeded its authority, and on Tuesday the Speaker agreed.

        Speaker Anthony Rota declared dozens of amendments added at committee after debate time ran out null and void, and ordered the bill to be reprinted without them.

        What were they thinking?

        “In some ways it’s indicative of frankly how the Liberals have handled this bill, almost from the get go. You’ve had a minister unable to effectively communicate the contents of it, you’ve had a provision pulled back which clearly has sparked enormous amount of concern across the country,” Geist said Tuesday. “And now, in the rush to try to get this legislation through without any real debate, and it oversteps the very boundaries of committee…”

        Isn’t that how the toxic left work?

        To paraphrase famous words from south of the border:  I will not tell you my policies until AFTER I am voted in.  I will not tell you what is in the bill until AFTER it has been passed/made into law.

        These authoritarian ways MUST BE STOPPED!

        This is not how a free and open democratic society works.

        So why are they trying to do this?

        The committee had been limited to five hours of debate by a Liberal and Bloc-supported motion in the House of Commons in an attempt by those parties to ensure the bill passes through the House of Commons before summer break.

        The two parties opted for the move after clause-by-clause amendment process at the committee took longer than expected, due to concerns about the bill’s impact on free expression. Those worries emerged after government amendments removed an exemption for user-generated content, putting social media platforms under the authority of the CRTC, though the CRTC’s powers were later limited in another government amendment.

        OH, now we see.

        The liberals/NDP want to force thru a bill that is so flawed, they don’t want discussions on the provisions, their consequences, etc.

        And then, they wanted to sneak in more amendments without others going over it? ! ?

        What criminals!

        #229991

        There is another horrible bill for censorship in Canada, it just keeps getting worse.

        https://odysee.com/@RebelNews:9/justin-trudeau-introduces-worst:9

        #230002

        #230005

        @Megazord_Jeremy  What did you expect from the lib-tards.

        They have an election call coming up, and needs all the help to stay in power.

        So any way to stop people talking about them, is better for them.

        #234934

        Talked has quieted down in those delayed lib-tard bills.

        We must never forget the danger Trudaeu is to Canada.  Like father like son.

        #234994
        Vknid
        Moderator

          Trudeau is not the issue. Just like Biden or Harris is not the issue. They are all just figureheads. Follow the puppet strings to the puppet masters.

        Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

        Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!

        SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!

        NAVIGATION