Hillary Clinton – (right-wing extremists are making a plan to steal 2024)

If “WE” win an election, it was fair and open.

If “WE” lose an election, it was FRAUD and STOLEN.

Yadda yadda yadda.

They are planting the seeds of doubt and fear-mongering, yet again.  These power-hungry people have been trying everything they can to hold onto power, even thought they are the worst when it comes to managing the economy, inflation, border security, law & order, etc.

The extremely toxic far alt-left must know that the people are seeing how their policies and agenda has made life WORSE, and the only way to correct it is by voting those morons out of office.

When the 2020 election happened I didn’t think it was stolen. Most people who voted for Biden didn’t like Trump and decided to vote for the other guy. In 2024 we could see a switch back to a republican president, though if Trump is on the ballot, I believe there will be an increase in libertarian voting.

I can’t recall this the time I have not heard a US federal or midterm election that one side or the other not yelling “fraud!” or “unfair!”.

That one side had started the “sky is falling” so early, I find revolting.

Democracy is at risk is the voters reject our policies for the other side’s policies.

No, that IS democracy at work, you kommi dictator elitist scumbags.

@Vknid which makes the moaning and crying even worse as if there was a way to prove some fraud, how can you guarantee democrats benefited from it? And the ballots have been in use for a long time, didn’t see members of the Trump cult complain in 2016. It’s clear that on the losing side people are gonna complain and make conspiracy theories but the moaning by the democrats stopped pretty quick. Clinton admitted her defeat the day after the election.

2 years later, Donnie boy is still acting like a baby and his cult followers  still won’t admit their L. The majority of republicans still think Trump won, and as a friendly reminder, Trump’s lunatic self proclaimed patriots started a riot and broke in to overturn the elections. That’s not even close.

Ratings, analytics, metrics, do numbers outside of election results mean anything to logical and rational people who can think?

How many times all over the world has a candidate brought in bigger numbers only  to lose the election? Would ask if the results that the media tells you are in congruence with what your own eyes, ears, and brain tell you? If they are not, would you be willing to question, or is psyop big bankster media snark enough to intimidate you into silence?

@comicsgate

The latest contention is in Brazil with Bolsanaro.

I’d like to hear your take on this.

How many times all over the world has a candidate brought in bigger numbers only  to lose the election? Would ask if the results that the media tells you are in congruence with what your own eyes, ears, and brain tell you?

Are you going for the anecdotes over empirical evidence atuff that Andrew Tate is pushing?

Oh no, do you think social media followers mirror who people are voting for? Some people are talented at attracting people to be completely invested in them and gaining a big following, sometimes as far as like a cult worshipping. That doesn’t mean people agree with them more.

A couple examples: more people identify as Trump fans than Biden fans and therefore Trump has more followers, yet more people seemed to prefer Biden’s policies and vote for him even tho very few are ”Biden fans” who would follow his social medias.

Andrew Tate had a huge fanbase of edgy teenagers striving to become an alpha male, yet more people found him as a facade scamming people.

BTS has way more followers on Twitter and Instagram than Eminem, AC/DC, you name it, but more people on the streets are familiar with the aftermentioned. Loyal fanbase is not the same as majority, it’s similar to the loud minority effect.