Is a goal to separate children from parents?
- This topic has 8 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 10 months, 2 weeks ago by
Vknid.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 1, 2023 at 8:07 am #300516
I believe one of the major goals coming down from the top is to get a wedge between parents and children. This is why you hear the radicals speaking about children belonging to the state and why there are moves being made to do things to kids without parents knowledge or permission. I think there a couple of goals of the gender nonsense but one of them is for sure to separate kids from parents. I have seen a number of TikTok’s where the topic is how to go “no contact”. In other words, how to separate functionally from your parents.
Of course the first question is why? Well, this historically seems to be a step that occurs when communism is coming in. I remember Lilly Tang Williams not to long ago talking about how she saw that happen when Mao was taking over. She is a Chinese immigrant running for office whom is old enough to remember the times of Mao and not just during that time but how communism was ushered in. She has many an interesting thing to say about what she saw then and what sees now.
June 1, 2023 at 12:59 pm #300518They came after the nuclear family, attacking dads and fathers.
Pre-marital/extra-marital sex.
Even in one-parent households, the values of that one parent can be passed down to the child.
And if those values goes against the narrative/extremely toxic far alt-left…
Indoctrinate via the school system, vis social media. What to think, not how to think for themselves. NPC’s wanting for instructions on what to protest next, etc.
But it is not moving fast enough, so in the schools these marxists are trying to bypass parental rights, and when the parents stand up, they are being called terrorists, etc. when in fact it is those pushing these agendas ARE the true traitors to the nation.
Why do you think they don’t want real history taught? Because then people can see exactly what is happening, why, etc.
Why do you think they don’t want FACTS being taught? Because then the illogical/irrational feelings can’t be exploited.
June 1, 2023 at 1:13 pm #300519Yes, they want children raised by the state.
This strategy started with Marx:
https://www.heritage.org/marriage-and-family/commentary/socialism-and-family“Karl Marx said as much In the Communist Manifesto of 1848, in which he called for the abolition of the family. The family was already absent among the proletariat, Marx and his co-author Friedrich Engels wrote, and among the bourgeoisie, the family was a mere “money relation.”
Most importantly, Marx said that communism would ensure that children would be educated by the state and not by their parents. Communists, he wrote in the Manifesto, would “rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.” The making of the “New Man” was the priority, and the family was an obstacle.”
“But it didn’t stop with Marx and Engels. Hungarian communists managed to establish a Hungarian soviet for a short time in 1919. They quickly realized that the way to completely change society was to destroy the most important civil society institution, the family. Its culture and education commissar, George Lukacs, therefore instituted a system to instruct young children into sexual perversions.
Lukacs’s biographer described it this way: “Special lectures were organized in schools and literature printed and distributed to ‘instruct’ children about free love, about the nature of sexual intercourse, about the archaic nature of bourgeois family codes, about the outdatedness of monogamy, and the irrelevance of religion, which deprives man of all pleasure. Children urged thus to reject and deride paternal authority and the authority of the church, and to ignore precepts of morality.”
None of this went down well with the typical Hungarian, needless to say, and the Hungarian soviet lasted only 133 days.”
It’s exactly what happened in the US. Which tells you who has been running the US since effectively over 100 years (no, not “the Jews”, even if Lukacs was one, but Marxists).
June 1, 2023 at 5:00 pm #300524Yes clearly this is intended and part of the plan. We can look back to Marx’s and other’s writings and see it. And then you can go back as short of a time as Mao and see that played out within memory. Yet despite that people don’t see it coming and even don’t believe that’s what is going on when told.
“and the irrelevance of religion, which deprives man of all pleasure”
This in my opinion is one of the great lies of communism (and the modern age). Because not only is it incorrect it is intentionally incorrect. This is said not so God can be removed to free humans of some restraining tether but to remove God so the state can enslave humans. The state does not want there to be no God, they just want to be God.
June 1, 2023 at 9:41 pm #300529Yet despite that people don’t see it coming and even don’t believe that’s what is going on when told.
This has been a multi-generational plan.
Slow, small steps that no one will notice until it is too late.
June 2, 2023 at 12:39 pm #300549This was unheard of when I was a kid/teen. When I was a teen, (14/15) we were taught sex education but ONLY with the parent’s permission via permission forms. They made that very clear at the time. Maybe I was fortunate because I’m hearing the exact opposite now.
June 2, 2023 at 1:23 pm #300551“When I was a teen, (14/15) we were taught sex education”
This used to be the case and it was for me too. But back then “Sex education” was essentially this goes here and does this and when you do that you can get pregnant or get a disease.
Now “sex education” is hey you can be a boy or a girl if you just take some pills and cut your junk off and hey what’s a girl anyway, no one really knows and don’t worry about telling your parents any of this.
June 2, 2023 at 10:02 pm #300580I grew up in Europe. We had sex ed in 3rd grade (age 8-9). If I recall, only the two muslim kids in our class sat it out.
But it was just part of biology class. We learned the very basics, what menstruation is, how sex works, how pregnancy works. That was about it. We expected to be shown dirty pictures and porn, but aside from a few drawings, it was just… boring. Which is about the best way sex ed can be. The less interesting it is, the less likely kids curiosity will be piqued. It’s normal for kids to be curious, it’s how we all learned to understand the world.
14/15 seems too old for me. By then puberty is over, hormones are raging and 90% of girls will have been sexually active. It’s best to learn earlier to take away the mystique, but also to inform kids about what it is before they are taken advantage of during puberty. Or accidentally become pregnant figuring things out on themselves.
June 3, 2023 at 10:12 am #300596Sex ed is fine. I am personally fine with it being a little earlier and I am fine with it being only with parents permission. But I do believe a parent should do that and not a school. Passing parental responsibilities off to a school has brought society to it’s knees.
But as I mentioned earlier, sex ed is no longer sex ed. Now it is agenda ed.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
