Oberlin College owes Gibson’s bakery $36M in defamation case, so why won’t it also say ‘sorry’?
On Sept. 8, following the Ohio Supreme Court’s refusal to hear Oberlin’s appeal of the largest defamation judgment in Ohio history, the college issued a statement promising to pay the $36.59 million judgment, including interest. It’s fair to assume that Oberlin’s other costs, including uninsured attorneys’ fees, probably amounted to $6 million to $10 million more.
Its about time.
But what this case all about?
This ordeal started on Nov. 9, 2016, when an Oberlin sophomore, who is Black, attempted to shoplift two bottles of wine and use a false ID to purchase alcohol at Gibson’s Bakery, located across the street from the college in Oberlin, Ohio. When he tried to flee, the grandson of the co-owner, who is White, tried to stop him and was beaten by him and two other Black Oberlin students who came to his aid. All three were arrested and later pled guilty.
So, it looks straight forward.
A shoplifter and his two associates beat up a baker. What was the problem?
The day after the incident, however, the Oberlin student body, aided and abetted by the college leadership, commenced a boycott of the bakery, claiming (but never proving) that it racially profiled the students involved and was an historically racist institution. When asked to provide “specifics” about this alleged “racist history,” Carmen Twillie Ambar, Oberlin’s president, replied that they were the “lived experience” of many students.
So, the students lied, the college lied, and a business suffered.
Are they saying, that because of the skin color of the criminals, they are ALLOWED to rob and attack a business, its employees, because of something that might have happened someplace else with someone not related to the bakery?
In its statement, the college promised to pay the $35.59 million judgment, including damages and accumulated interest. Oberlin noted that it values “our relationship with the City of Oberlin” and looks forward to “continuing our support of and partnership with local businesses….” Conspicuously absent from this missive was any form of a mea culpa directed to Gibson’s Bakery and the Gibson family, the victim of Oberlin’s defamatory action.
So, so long as it is NOT a business owned by someone they have a racial hatred for, they will support them.
But a business stopping shoplifting you are still opposed to? Won’t apologize for your wrongful actions?
What should have been a teachable moment in 2016 – that college students are obligated to determine the facts before embarking on a course that would likely devastate an innocent family business – is now more relevant than ever.
Liability and the absence of a discriminatory past on the bakery’s part are now both legally undisputed, so it prompts the question: where are the adults among the Oberlin faculty and alumni? Having wasted about $40 million in an effort to prove what was a fatally flawed legal case from the outset, it’s well past time that Oberlin alumni came together to petition Ambar and her board to issue a formal apology to the Gibson family.
Facts? Why have facts when you can jump to an incorrect conclusion to force a false narrative.
Yet another example of a failed “education” system, and failed college/faculty.
.
