Roll up your sleeves, again…

Baaaaaa baaaaaa baaaa     Says the sheep

Why would Moderna employees get vaxxed with the first ever mRNA-tech based product of a company that always had their products blocked from market releases due to safety concerns during normal procedures and had their first product approved for use during a crisis that lowered the effective testing requirements and procedures to be allowed onto said market?

They’re scientists, supposedly. Everyone knows respectable scientists don’t do guinea pig testing on themselves, especially not in vivo.

Comortality, or rather, Comirnaty, as the Pfizer fake vaccine has been formally dubbed after being approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, is now ready for the next propaganda push:

Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee), for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older. The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals.

“The FDA’s approval of this vaccine is a milestone as we continue to battle the COVID-19 pandemic. While this and other vaccines have met the FDA’s rigorous, scientific standards for emergency use authorization, as the first FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine, the public can be very confident that this vaccine meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product,” said Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, M.D. “While millions of people have already safely received COVID-19 vaccines, we recognize that for some, the FDA approval of a vaccine may now instill additional confidence to get vaccinated. Today’s milestone puts us one step closer to altering the course of this pandemic in the U.S.”

I wonder what the odds are on Comirnaty being “voluntarily withdrawn” by Pfizer faster than Vioxx was withdrawn by Merck five years and four months after being FDA-approved? At least 2-1, I’d think.

Now that Comirnaty has been formally declared to meet the US government’s high standards for safety and effectiveness, there is obviously no need for Pfizer to be provided any more immunity from legal liability, right?

UPDATE: Karl Denninger notes that the FDA broke the law with this approval, and furthermore, has rendered the administration of both the Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines illegal.

So the FDA has “fully approved” the Pfizer jab for Covid.

In doing so standing alone they have broken the law and thus have irrevocably destroyed their authority and any reason for anyone to ever do anything based on them ever again.

Let me explain.

Under black letter law an EUA is illegal if there is an alternative that is considered safe, effective and available. This was the reason the FDA did not (for 18 months!) run the studies and evaluate them on other early-intervention drugs for Covid-19. We all know what they are. I’m living proof they work too, as are millions of others worldwide.

But, more-importantly, this “full approval” voids all other vaccine EUAs for Covid-19. That is, under the law the Moderna and J&J instantly became illegal to offer or use within the United States.

The makers can apply for full authorization, of course, but the EUAs are void as of this morning and under black letter law cannot be administered to anyone in the United States as they are now unlicensed and unlawful products in human beings until and unless they are given full approval themselves. No medical provider can offer or administer any other than the Pfizer Covid-19 shot in the United States as of the moment of that approval.

You can bet the law will be ignored; note MRNAs stock price this morning. It should have instantly been cut in half.

In addition the FDA broke the law itself when it issued the “approval.” The law requires a full hearing and the data from the full set of trials; the trials are not capable of being completed until early 2022 by the original submissions and they deliberately did not hold the hearing. This is a black letter violation of the law as well, but nobody cares.

Vaccine Mandates Move Ahead After F.D.A. Approval of Pfizer Shot

Full federal approval for the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine for those 16 and older is opening the way for institutions like the military, corporate employers, hospitals and school districts to announce vaccine mandates for their employees.

As if that detail had stopped many corporations from already mandating them.

“Today’s news marks a critical moment for people who were concerned about getting vaccinated due to the vaccines being authorized for emergency use,” the statement said. “With millions of data points on the vaccine’s safety and efficacy over nearly nine months of vaccinations, every ‘i’ is dotted and every ‘t’ is crossed.”

But it still does not list “long-term side effects”!

So in the short term (9 months), while where has been “side effects”, they are rare enough to be mostly ignored by the legacy media, politicians, etc.

The F.D.A.’s approval action on Monday could reinforce the legal standing of some mandates and pave the way for some organizations to impose stricter requirements and no longer allow employees the option of frequent testing as an alternative to getting vaccinated.

“Show Us Your Papers!”  or “NO JOB FOR YOU!”  nazis!

…full approval of the vaccine would make a difference, “mostly by providing confidence to businesses, schools, and yes, our military to mandate vaccines. And it is already starting to happen.”

By forcing people to get a drug put into your body you do not want/trust.

And as mentioned in another article:

Politicizing COVID-19 vaccine mandates could backfire, experts warn.

When you have celebrities and politicians that are pushing an agenda, and they come out demanding we get this drug, the pushback is real.

…turning the question of mandatory vaccination into a wedge issue “may rub people the wrong way,”

…

“They may perceive a lack of sincerity in what the leaders are saying, and they may see this as simply (a means of) political gain. And people see political gain as selfish gain,” …

Exactly.

Some people, he said, “just don’t feel ready” — and further politicizing the issue of vaccine mandates “may push people further away,” he warned.

So we see who all are pushing for the jabs, and say “I do NOT trust you, your agenda, your message.”

But talk to a trusted someone.  A family member, a friend, your local medical professionals.

All they can do is repeat the same the legacy media and those others people are stating.

As one who does not travel, I won’t missing taking planes, trains, or cruise ships.

As one who does not drive across national borders, I won’t miss it.

As one who does not working for any government (federal, state/provincial/municipal), I won’t miss it.

As one who does not eat-in at restaurants/bars, I won’t miss it.

As one who can’t afford to go to concerts, live events, or sporting events, I won’t miss it.

As one who does not go to a movie theater (last time was the Last Jedi – 2017), I won’t miss it.  Besides, there is no new movies WORTH seeing in the theater, IMO.

Ah, so it’s basically “Congrats on the first fully approved vaccine, don’t mind the legal mess.” Got it.

Are you ready to get a jab booster before the end of the year, and again next year, and the year after that because…

What Is the ‘COVID-22 Variant’ and Should Americans Be Worried?

Yes, they are already talking about it.

The term appears to have been coined by Sai Reddy, a professor of synthetic immunology at ETH Zurich, a public research university in Switzerland.

In an interview with German-language newspaper Blick on August 22, Reddy discussed the potential for future COVID variants to arise that could potentially be worse than others the world has experienced so far—a reasonable concern echoed by others as well.

Reddy went on to describe the delta variant as “no longer COVID-19” and instead referred to it as “COVID-21.”

He added, translated from German: “It is the next phase of the pandemic when Beta or Gamma become more infectious or Delta develops escape mutations. That will be the big problem for the coming year. Covid-22 could get worse than what we are witnessing now.”

SO what is it?

“COVID is an abbreviation for Coronavirus Disease. The virus that causes this is SARS-CoV-2.”

“Delta is not COVID-21 or a variant of COVID-19—it is a variant of SARS-CoV-2. Any future variants will also be SARS-CoV-2.”

So why are we hearing the delta variant is a variant of Covid-19?  Because it fits the agenda, IMO.

“Regardless of the naming, there is a real risk of future variants. Each time the virus infects someone it changes a little,” he told Newsweek.

“Since the beginning of the pandemic we have seen the virus change, becoming more and more transmissible. More recently we have seen variants that have begun to somewhat evade the protection provided by the vaccines.”

The fear mongering continues.