School choice is sweeping America. Supreme Court gave parents even more options

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #274054

    School choice is sweeping America. Now, Supreme Court has given parents even more options.

    Since COVID-19 emerged in early 2020, families have had their children’s education upended.

    Many public schools remained shuttered to in-person learning for more than a year, leaving parents with few options – especially if they couldn’t afford private schools that were much more likely to keep their classrooms open during the pandemic.

    The frustration that ensued from parents juggling work and their children’s learning, as well as the depression many students suffered while being stuck at home, spurred an explosion of school choice initiatives around the country.

    Think of the children!

    A new decision by the U.S. Supreme Court will surely add to this momentum…

    …on Tuesday, the court once again sided strongly with both school choice and religious freedom.

    Power to the parents, success to the students!

    …the government could not prevent parents from choosing religious schools within a private educational choice program, and that discrimination based on the faith “status” of a school violates the First Amendment.

    Maine had attempted to bypass that ruling by drawing a convoluted distinction between “status” and “use” – saying it didn’t want taxpayer dollars going to religious instruction. The state grants tuition assistance to families who live in rural areas without a public school so students can attend either a nearby district or a private school, but it stopped short of allowing parents to choose sectarian schools.

    Since faith-based schools are going to integrate religion into their curriculum, this was a flimsy argument.

    And is very discriminatory.

    “The State pays tuition for certain students at private schools – so long as the schools are not religious. That is discrimination against religion. A State’s anti-establishment interest does not justify enactments that exclude some members of the community from an otherwise generally available public benefit because of their religious exercise.”

    Because they want the people to WORSHIP them, not God.

    This will have huge implications around America, as most of the states’ Blaine Amendments, which prevent state dollars from going toward religious schools, will be effectively void.

    And what is that?

    …these antiquated measures on the books, vestiges of 19th century anti-Catholic bigotry.

    About time that is removed.  Otherwise that is like saying we can have islamophobia because the government is ANTI-religion, or allowing anti-semitic.

    The Michigan-based Mackinac Center Legal Foundation is seeking to overturn the state’s anti-choice amendment…

    Which is…

    Even though the amendment’s language is “neutral,” it was enacted with “anti-religious hostility,” according to Patrick Wright, director of the legal foundation.

    How will the woke/sjw/anti-religion groups indoctrinate students if their monopoly on education is removed?

    Hopefully, such institutions doing indoctrinations will lose students/enrollments and will be closed permanently.

    #274145
    Vknid
    Moderator

      Clearly education is being used for indoctrination purposes.  All I want is to be able to use my tax dollars to decide which school my child goes too.  This would break the indoctrination and create a school meritocracy.   You would see private and religious schools compete for the best students.  That one change could create an education renaissance.

      #274157

      That one change could create an education renaissance.

      And that is why the public teacher’s union/communists are so OPPOSED to school choice.

      If they had to provide “QUALITY” education, they themselves would FAIL.

      And since so many public school systems (that I have heard of) have a “leave no child behind” policy, that means that even if the kid FAILS, they are pushed to the next grade so they can get them out of the system ASAP.

      Why do the public teacher’s union/communists want to get rid of universal exams?  Because it would show which schools are teaching children and which are nothing but big babysitting services.

      #274162
      Mustangride1
      Moderator

        Actually @Legatus_Legionis the reason they want to get rid of the “Universal Exams” is because they are being forced to prepare the kids for that test instead of actually teach the kids.

        Yes “No child left behind” is also a massive problem, children should be flunked instead of promoted. But that is only a small part of it… Discipline is the single largest problem, not just with students but to the few teachers who inject personal agenda in to what should be a neutral topics that have no reason to be in the classroom. Even in the few classes where today’s social and economical topics are taught, you should never know your teachers politics or opinions on the criteria.

        A teacher should remain Neutral while on the job as to the subject they are instructing.

      Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

      Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!

      SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!

      NAVIGATION