Twitter Censorship

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #195120

    https://www.dailywire.com/news/breaking-senators-to-subpoena-twitter-ceo-jack-dorsey-for-actively-interfering-in-election

    So after the Joe Biden/Hunter Biden New York Post story, Twitter is completely silencing people who link to the story. First it was the Post itself, then it was Kayleigh McEnany, then it was Trump’s campaign account, and so much more. Now the Senate is subpoenaing Jack Dorsey for “actively interfering in this election in a way that has no precedent in the history of our country.” So do you think the Senate Republicans will hold Twitter, Facebook, and other social media giants accountable? Or do you think there will be just be one hearing where Dorsey lies about stuff and then they let him off the hook?

    #195123

    Selective censorship.

    The US needs to strip these platforms of their protection.

     

    #195152

    The Senate should actually enforce law 230 or whatever its called that Twatter and fascist dork hide behind.

    They claim they are platforms; and prove the lie with actions like this one showing they are publishers. Publishers are not protected under the law.

     

    So enforce the law as written; sue the fuck out of both of these companies for pretending to be platforms and violating free speech.

    #195166

    Idk if you guys know about this, but http://www.thedonald.win is a 24/7 all Trump, all MAGA rally.

    #195207

    I like the excuse they have given;

    We block those articles whom referred to material from a hacked source.

    Yet all the “leaks” and “illegal/forged” documents by those who are not with their “agenda” is OK.

     

    You can’t post hate speech, or organized riots, yet they allow those attached to CHAD, BLM, ANTIFA, and those terrorist organizations oversees are OK to use the platform.

    They openly encourage anarchy and civil disobedience.

    They need to be held responsible for there actions.

     

    #195208

    They do need to be responsible for their actions, and Section 230 needs gone through with a fine comb.

    In the meantime, Jack Dorsey will only get a weak slap on his fragile wrist by the government.

    #195209

    thumbsup

    That’s a new one for me. Thanks fren.

    #195211

    Hunter Biden is a loser and his father is corrupt.

    #195214

    Unfortunately, I see too many people not only refuse but can’t accept responsibility for anything they do.  It is all society’s fault, not theirs!

    They want the POWER, but not be RESPONSIBLE.

    So yay, that protection must be removed.

    #195216

    Agree.

    They want people to vote for them, and then he will be removed, as per article 25 (?).

    Then the true person the dems wanted for pres gets the job.

    The kamala administration.

    First female VP.

    First female VP of non-white origin.

    First female pres.

    First female pres of non-white origin.

    The dems don’t care for policy, just power and being the first.

     

    Afterall, biden did say that he will/has refused to answer questions on policy until AFTER he is elected president.

    Or like the dems have done in the past… if you want to know what is in the package, you have to make it into law first, then you get to read what you just signed into law.

    BS!

    #195234

    The question that scares the fuck out of me is why would Soreass want Kumalong in the oval office?

    The whore has no morals and will do the exact oposite of what she agreed to the day before if a better bribe cums long.

    #195244

    She will say and do anything her “masters” tell her to do.

    If they tell her they want to legalize infanticide, she will say “up to what age?”

    If they tell her to create a war (or three), she will say “when do you want it to begin?”

    If want state controlled censorship, and only approved propaganda be allowed in the media and taught in our “education” system, she will she “Done!”

    etc.

    #195263

    Twitter Changing Policy after outcry

    Twitter said late Thursday it was changing its policy on hacked content after an outcry about its handling of an unverified political story that prompted cries of censorship from the right.

    The social media company will no longer remove hacked material unless it’s directly shared by hackers or those working with them, the company’s head of legal, policy, trust and safety, Vijaya Gadde, said in a Twitter thread.

    And instead of blocking links from being shared, tweets will be labeled to provide context, Gadde said.

    “We want to address the concerns that there could be many unintended consequences to journalists, whistleblowers and others in ways that are contrary to Twitter’s purpose of serving the public conversation,” she said.

    They are only concerned that they were caught (blocking the press secretary of the white house even!) and for creating the Streisand effect that made MORE people want to know how corrupt the bidens are.

    Twitter and Facebook had moved quickly this week to limit the spread of the story published by the … New York Post.

    That is censorship!

    That is fascism!

    This is agenda over facts and truths.

    #195266

    They will pack the court for this reason if they win.

    #195286

    Once the authoritarians (dems) get in, they will do all in their power to corrupt the constitution to ensure they will remain in power until the nation is destroyed.

    While I agree with a maximum age (before forced retirement) like Canada has for its Supreme Court, everything else the party of delusions wants to do is pure insanity.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!

SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!

NAVIGATION