Walgreens plans to close 5 San Fran stores, citing rampant shoplifting

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #244100

    Walgreens plans to close 5 San Francisco stores, citing rampant shoplifting and ‘organized retail crime’

    “Organized retail crime continues to be a challenge facing retailers across San Francisco, and we are not immune to that,” Walgreens spokesperson Phil Caruso said. “Retail theft across our San Francisco stores has continued to increase in the past few months to five times our chain average.”

    When you have the government legalizing shoplifting (criminal activities), then what did they expect?

    And this was on top of the ten stores they had to close in 2019.

    In October, 2020, one Walgreens location closed after saying it lost $1,000 in stolen merchandise every day.

    And who can blame a company for closing stores?

    The demented government officials, the AG, the prosecutors, etc. who all made shoplifting legal in San Fran.

    When we see vid posted of criminals coming into stores with garbage bags and empty shelves into them and walk out, leaving customers and employees powerless to stop it least they be changed with a crime.

     

    #244174

    California: Let’s become very business-unfriendly. Let’s let people just just take what they want from stores and not do anything about it.

    Also California: Why can’t we get businesses to come or stay in our state? Those businesses are mean because they won’t stay and give our people jobs!

    Rest of the world: You’re taking the meaning of the phrase “Special kind of stupid” to places no one thought was possible.

    #244176

    @Audie I think you made a spelling error.  Isn’t it Kommifornia, not California?

    #244509

    Walgreens is abandoning San Francisco because leftist policies created a shoplifting crisis

    Economics students learn in their 101 classes that basic markets can’t function without a few prerequisites — namely, the protection of private property rights. It’s an introductory concept because it’s almost self-evident: How can people do business if they’re not secure in their property and profits? Yet the furthest-left faction of today’s Democratic Party, which governs in the most liberal bastions such as San Francisco, has abandoned even this most basic lesson. And, just as econ 101 predicted, stores are abandoning the California city in droves.

    No wonder anything the toxic left do leads to destruction.

    It’s not just a megacorporation that’s getting hurt here. It’s these stores’ employees, customers, local economies, and even local governments that will lose tax revenue.

    Why worry, when you have big brother (state and feds) to bail you out for your failed policies.

    Yet none of this is a coincidence. The city isn’t just experiencing a run of bad luck — its rampant shoplifting problem is directly rooted in its terrible policy choices.

    Exactly!

    The local government’s lax approach to enforcing property rights and the rule of law has directly fueled this shoplifting crisis, and we have more than anecdotes to prove it.

    Such as…

    Simply put, the city government sent the message that shoplifting wouldn’t be as harshly punished and — shocker! — criminals listened.

    So by making it easier to shoplift, and having lighter sentences and not prosecuting ALOT of the crimes, that tells the criminals it is a free-for-all.

    Oh, but insurance will cover it, right?  Only to a point.  Insurance rates will go up to cover all the claims, and that will increase the prices.

    So in the end, it is the paying customers who have to pay more because shoplifting is legalized by toxic alt-left policies.

    But as Walgreens have made it clear, there comes a time with the cost of doing business (be it in a certain city or county or state), it is not worth it.

    San Fran, you have proven it is NOT worth doing business in San Fran.

    Gary (Nerdrotic) can attest to that directly.

     

    #250741

    And in comes the spinsters;

    Shoplifting numbers for all of San Francisco doubled in September after one Target location changed the method it uses to report the crime

    Bay Area businesses are concerned about a wave of retail crime in San Francisco, with shocking video of coordinated robberies making headlines around the world.

    And it was truly shocking.

    But data from the San Francisco Police Department tells an oddly different story…

    OH, really?

    Rather than a rising wave, the monthly number of shoplifting reports over the past 18 months has largely remained below pre-pandemic averages, except for a spike in September that briefly doubled August’s count.

    So does a flash mob robbery count as just ONE crime?  Instead of twenty separate criminals/thieves/shoplifters?

    Interestingly, the number of shoplifting reports for November have fallen back below 200, in spite of the high-profile spate of burglaries over Thanksgiving weekend.

    And it’s not just shoplifting. SFPD reports of commercial burglary and robbery are also below pre-pandemic averages, with no significant spikes in recent months.

    Could it be because anything under $1,000 (or whatever the dollar amount) is NOT a crime, so it is not in the “official” stats?

    So the numbers they are “reporting” are false and misleading.

    A CVS spokesperson told the Chronicle that the company loses $200 million per year from organized retail crime, while Walmart says retail theft costs the US economy tens of billions of dollars each year.

    In a time where the spend drunk congress has multi-Trillion dollar bills they want to force thru, what is a mire ten billion to them, and why should they care about stopping their constituents from re-distribution the wealth/merchandise at the ground level.

     

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!

SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!

NAVIGATION