A School District’s proposed dress policies-if it covers your underwear-OK

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #308029

    Parent Strips Down During School Board Meeting: ‘I Wanted to Make a Clear Argument’

    An Arizona father stripped down to a crop top and short shorts at a school board meeting to protest a proposed dress code that would allow tank tops and students showing their midriff.

    Sadly, I see students that do to a nearby high school allowed to show their midriffs and spandex where their camel toes are clearly outlined.

    Latham, the father of four students in the district, said the lax dress code was inappropriate for a school environment and would create distractions in the classroom.

    But then that is a YOU (male students’) problem, and not for these exhibitionists.

    “The fact that we have adults advocating for children to have less clothing on is absurd to me,” (Board member Anna van Hoek) said. “I think it’s doing these kids a disservice by allowing them to be able to wear whatever they want to school.”

    What is in this change in policy?

    …the proposal to change dress standards to require students to merely cover their underwear…

    A male student does not have to wear a shirt of any type?

    A female student can wear a g-string/pasties and be allowed to wear something as small as a bikini in the classroom.

    How is that OK and not distracting?

    But if they only have to merely cover their underwear, both cases would be allowed.

    But what of those dudes that like to wear their pants so low their underwear is showing?  Isn’t that racist to ask them to pull up their pants?

    What if a female does not wear a bra (as some don’t), can they be as topless as the males?

    And what if, we have a trans/someone identifying not as their biological sex?

    Does that mean someone born in a female body claiming to be male, then do they not have to wear a bra/shirt as males don’t usually wear anything under their t-shirts?  No “underwear” to cover, it is OK then to be topless and to show as must flesh as you can?

    Or is this what they secretly want?  Males in tight shorts where their every bulge is clearly outlined and females in just bikini bottoms where their camel toe and rear are also clearly outlined.

    Sure, it is one step removed, but then we are one step closer.

    Then does this mean that the teachers could ask for their dress code to likewise be the same?

    Just like in a business/work environment, you have to wear “appropriate” attire.  This policy does NOT do that.  It does not get their students prepared for the real world.

    #308041
    Vknid
    Moderator

      A lot of people would look at this and say, it’s such a small thing who cares.  Who are we to tell them what to wear.

      Well that very attitude played out thousands of times over a few decades is why the west is in such moral decay and has so many social problems.  We ceded ground a few inches at a time so many times we are now backed up to the edge of a cliff.

      If it stops now it might be too late.

      #308086
      DarthVengeant
      Premium

        They don’t have this problem in many other countries because schools have uniforms. I have always thought that is how it should be here in USA.

        Problem solved.

        #308087

        When I was at infant school (Elementary School) we were required to wear uniforms. Girls had to wear skirts or dresses in the summer (which I hated because I hate showing off skin, even a little bit if it happens to be a million degrees during the summer) and trousers in winter (which I preferred). I was nearly doing cartwheels when I got to secondary school (High School); the one I went to required you to wear suitable casual clothing as long as it was neat and didn’t have anything lewd on it. No uniform (if memory serves me correctly, they had ditched that a year before I started). Happy days (aside from the bullying)! Now my old school has gone back to the uniform ways and I’m glad that I’ve left because it looks like it’s back to the whole skirts for girls thing.

        #308091

        Props to the dad for trying even if it still passed by a 3-2 vote.

        Another article quoted the board’s Govornor (1) and member Amanda Wade (2):

        (1) ‘ “We’re saying that they need to cover up because of the way it might make someone else feel and that is wrong.” ‘

        (2) ‘ “These are kids. They’re not at a job and I recognize at the end of the day this is the most job that they have but we need to allow freedom”

        https://cafemom.com/news/dad-strips-down-to-crop-top-and-short-shorts-at-school-board-meeting/some-board-members-argued-the-current-policy-unfairly-targeted-female?utm_source=AppleNews&utm_medium=feed

        My point is this: School is supposed to prepare you for the real world.  Having acknowledged that there are dress codes in the workplace, if children become accustomed to (unfettered) freedom to dress as they please won’t it be difficult for them to transition once they enter the job market?

        I suppose at that point they’ll file complaints with HR and/or mount a campaign to change workplace dress codes…right?

        You can find more even more quotes from the board members who voted in favour of the policy and sadly it seems as though they just wanted to change things to give themselves a sense of accomplishment with little regard for the ramifications of their actions down the line.

        Bloody woke lunatics…

        #308092
        Vknid
        Moderator

          This is just another push to edge things towards their being no standards for essentially anything.  I mean, that’s ultimately one of the goals of the left.  They want to normalize everything society has frowned of forever.  Well, certain things are frowned on or have stigma for very good reason as they are detrimental to people and society.  Yet they sell woke as a freedom from tradition, societal norms and any tethers to religion. But the part they don’t tell you is that ends in woke enslavement where to criticize anything is to be attacked.   Violating the norms in a traditional society might get you some dirty looks or fussed at by an old lady.  Violate woke norms and you get fired from your job, banned from social media, openly attacked and possibly debanked.  And living the woke lifestyle often results in long term misery, loneliness and loss of purpose and hope.  We see this already being played out.  I don’t think I would refer to that as freedom.

          • This reply was modified 7 months, 1 week ago by Vknid.
        Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

        Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!

        SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!

        NAVIGATION