Chauvin Guilty on All Counts

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 37 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #218946

    Well Chauvin has been found guilty on all counts. Of course, this was because the jury was probably worried that they and their family would be attacked by the rioters. Following the trial (and watching CNN doesn’t count) shows that the prosecution’s case was completely broken and the defense was clearly winning. But of course with all the riots going on, I’m not surprised

    #218947
    DigiCat
    Moderator

      Haven’t really been paying attention to what’s going on in the real world lately 😅 so…

      What’s going on? Who’s Chauvin? What was he accused of??

      #218948
      Mustangride1
      Moderator

        He was guilty the second the video was released.

        I am so firmly against showing videos, they are evidence in cases and can be extremely prejudicial, Tack on Politicians, Media, Actors, everyone on Social Media. The odds of a fair trial dwindle to nothing. Now add on Riots, Threats of Violence, what jury would ever find a person Not Guilty when they are in fear for their lives?

        Do I think he was Guilty (yes based off the video) I would like to think I would be able to be fair, but being honest, even if there was evidence to the contrary I would fear for myself and family. At Least I’m honest enough to admit it. I would also told the Judge that.

        Had no video been released, had the PD arrested Rioters, Had the Guard been brought in to stop Riots, Had politicians kept their cockholsters shut and had he had a fair trial by uninfluenced jurors that had no reason to fear if they found him Not Guilty, or Guilty. Then it would have been Justice.

        This was a LYNCHING based on fear not justice.

        #218949
        DigiCat
        Moderator

          What video???

          #218950
          Mustangride1
          Moderator

            @Digicat, this is another one of those pinch your cheeks moments…

            #218955

            Talk about handcuffing the police from being able to do their jobs – taking dangerous criminals off the streets.

             

            So if anyone dies while in contact with the police, it is a murder charge?

             

            There was a video from a different angle that showed the officer’s knee was on the shoulder blade (and NOT the neck).

            A video from another officer’s bodycam shows that Chauvin’s knee is not pressing on Floyd’s neck. After watching the video, Chief of Minneapolis Police Department Medaria Arradondo agreed that a different angle indicated that the knee was not strangling Floyd’s airway.

            That a person died is sad.

            Was the office guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and manslaughter?

            Second degree murder is generally defined as intentional murder that lacks premeditation, is intended to only cause bodily harm, and demonstrates an extreme indifference to human life.

            Did the officer intend to murder this person?  No.

            Was the officer intend to only cause bodily harm?  No.  (The deceases was kicking, and having him on the ground was the safest for the individual, the officers, and those around them).

            Demonstrate extreme indifference to human life?  Again No.  That would have been to just let he go and do more harm to the community or himself.

            Third-degree murder: The unintentional killing of another through an eminently dangerous act committed with a depraved mind and without regard for human life.

            Eminently dangerous act?

            With a “depraved mind”?

            Is that because the POLICE officer was also a toxic masculine white male?

            As the media is villifying all police, all males, all whites?

            manslaughter: the crime of killing a human being without malice aforethought, or otherwise in circumstances not amounting to murder.

            also:

            malice aforethought: the intention to kill or harm

            So manslaughter is defined as the crime of killing a human being without the intention of killing.

            Of all the charges, this last one is the only one I see as being valid charge.

            • This reply was modified 3 years ago by Legatus_Legionis. Reason: spelling errors
            #218959

            Talk about handcuffing the police from being able to do their jobs – taking dangerous criminals off the streets.

            So if anyone dies while in contact with the police, it is a murder charge?

            There was a video from a different angle that showed the officer’s knee was on the shoulder blade (and NOT the neck).

            A video from another officer’s bodycam shows that Chauvin’s knee is not pressing on Floyd’s neck. After watching the video, Chief of Minneapolis Police Department Medaria Arradondo agreed that a different angle indicated that the knee was not strangling Floyd’s airway.

            That a person died is sad.

            Was the office guilty of second-degree murder, third-degree murder and manslaughter?

            Second degree murder is generally defined as intentional murder that lacks premeditation, is intended to only cause bodily harm, and demonstrates an extreme indifference to human life.

            Did the officer intend to murder this person?  No.

            Was the officer intend to only cause bodily harm?  No.  (The deceases was kicking, and having him on the ground was the safest for the individual, the officers, and those around them).

            Demonstrate extreme indifference to human life?  Again No.  That would have been to just let he go and do more harm to the community or himself.

            Third-degree murder: The unintentional killing of another through an eminently dangerous act committed with a depraved mind and without regard for human life.

            Eminently dangerous act?

            With a “depraved mind”?

            Is that because the POLICE officer was also a toxic masculine white male?

            As the media is villifying all police, all males, all whites?

            manslaughter: the crime of killing a human being without malice aforethought, or otherwise in circumstances not amounting to murder.

            also: malice aforethought: the intention to kill or harm

            So manslaughter is defined as the crime of killing a human being without the intention of killing.

            Of all the charges, this last one is the only one I see as being valid charge.

            A person died by one without the intention of killing him.

            #218961

            @DigiCat Derek Chauvin was the police officer who arrested George Floyd last year and… severely mishandled his arrest, which resulted in summer-long riots in the USA.

            Initially even right-wingers were horrified at the footage, but an autopsy revealed Floyd’s system had lethal quantities of fentanyl, and there was leaked footage from the Daily Mail (British publication) which showed important context in the events that led to Floyd’s death:

            https://www.foxnews.com/media/tucker-carlson-reaction-leaked-george-floyd-footage

            This doesn’t excuse Chauvin’s actions or let him off the hook. But what’s important is how the Left is trying to frame this: That Floyd was murdered by a racist cop just for committing a minor infraction while being black, and this somehow justified letting anarchists cut loose; setting fire to public and private property, committing murder, rape and kidnapping, assaulting random strangers in public, destroying monuments of national heritage and even stetting up their own autonomous zone in the middle of Seattle.

            While in actuality, the larger story points toward Chauvin being incompetent at best, and guilty of manslaughter at worst. Chauvin’s intent was clearly to incapacitate Floyd because he was resisting arrest and his hysterical behavior (likely influenced by drugs) made him seem dangerous to himself and others. It was just extreme gross negligence on his part not to realize Floyd was in no condition to be rendered unconscious.

            Of course, by that time, the Left had already invested their emotional narrative that Floyd is the next MLK and they will fight to defend that stance with blood and nails. In a sane society, we would be discussing better police training for certain departments so that something like Floyd’s death doesn’t happen again. But we have too many race-baiters who would rather set emotionally-driven narratives because they are easier for people to believe in, from which you can profit off and secure elections by making empty promises that are actually impossible to resolve.

            I kinda figured that thanks to the inflamed political climate, Chauvin wasn’t going to get a fair trial and nothing less than convicting him of outright murder would satisfy the Left. But no-one is exactly in a rush to passionately defend him, either. I mean, he didn’t exactly set himself as a model example of law enforcement (though I won’t deny it sets a bad precedent; when you have a congresswoman giving veiled threats if a trial doesn’t go the way she wants, you’re already looking at an erosion of the justice system).

            #218963

            George Floyd was heavily on drugs and was out of it. Before he was arrested, he was pointing a gun at a black pregnant woman.

            I knew the trial wouldn’t be fair because of threats and dox to the judges. It was mostly, if not guilty, riot and theft. Guilty, nothing.

            #218970
            Mustangride1
            Moderator

              @Legatus_Legionis

              Manslaughter fit possibly, however, I will also say had the jury not been tainted (and I will say forever he could not get a fair trial based off so many things) they may have found on that charge, though they could based off the other video and tox report found him not guilty.

              The Charge MOST fitting of all was Involuntary Manslaughter, But there has to be negligence or recklessness. That might have been provable, as they had him down so long.

              Bottom line right now is 3 guilty verdicts that do not fit the crime, after hearing and seeing the trial evidence. Yes the Officer should have been fired, yes charged FOR MINIMUM of Involuntary and as high as Manslaughter, but when so much influence had came to bare as much as I hate to say it, all charges dismissed as there is no possibility of a fair trial IMO.

              This is truly a case where NO JUSTICE happens for Mr Floyd or the Officers. True justice would have been a fair trial and anyone who says this was is living life with blinders on. That saddens me.  The Jury return time says this was over and done with before the first Oath was taken.

               

              #218978

              The US (and the world) is divided, more than ever. At this point, living in a democrat city/state is risking your life.  I suggest you all to move to non lefty states, move to Florida, for example.

              We cannot trust the justice system anymore, now what really counts is the mobs, the real ones and the virtual ones. Riots, Destruction, Fear and Twitter Mob. Nothing else matters, right now. Doesn’t matter if you have any factual evidence, what matters is: are the mobs happy or not? don’t let them angry! “they all know where we live”. And police can’t do anything, because if they do, they’re racists.
              These are dangerous times… unbelievable times.

              I’m starting to respect more the places (countries, states…) where you cannot play around with the police. If you’re a criminal, you are going down, is just a matter of time. If you’re a criminal you have no excuses,  you have no right to hurt innocent people, you must go to jail or have a bullet in your head, it depends on how you wanna play it.

              Criminals are bullies… a teenager, stealing stuff, harassing people, walking around with a gun like a thug is a criminal. They worry about this kind of people but don’t worry about the people these criminals hurt? they steal, they rape, they murder… but if they get shot, the mob protects the criminal and riot against the cops? wtf is this world? Imagine you are having a walk with your family, a criminal shows up starts harassing your family, threating you with a gun but if the cops come and shoot him, people are going to defend the criminal, just because he’s a poc?

              Last week, black thugs killed a 7 year old little girl. Multiple shots, she was inside the car with her dad. Imagine if before the shooting, some cops found the criminals and shot them down, the mob would be furious, angry, calling the cops racists… but they wouldn’t know that the cops had just saved a little girl’s life. THEY DON’T CARE.

              Fuck this. We are entering in a very scary era. Get ready.

              #218985

              Newsmax host: Jury decided to ‘sacrifice’ Chauvin to the mob

              Rob Schmitt, host of “Wake Up America” on the conservative network Newsmax, said on Tuesday that former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin was a “sacrifice to the mob” after he was found guilty on three counts in the murder of George Floyd.

              agree

              “They say justice is blind. I don’t think it was blind in this case at all,” Schmitt said. “I think you have political pressure. I think you have pressure from all these activist groups going into all this. And I think at the end of the day people say, ‘You know what? If we acquit this guy, this city is going to burn to the ground.'”

              “So you had a jury that said, ‘You know what? We’re gonna have to sacrifice this guy to the mob.’ And that’s exactly what I think happened today,” Schmitt added.

              x

              The jury’s verdict delivers accountability for Derek Chauvin, but not justice for George Floyd. Real justice for him and too many others can only happen when we build a nation that fundamentally respects the human dignity of every person,” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) tweeted.

              And what of all those homicides that have no convictions?  All those black-on-black murders?

              Don’t those lives matter?

              All those violent criminals are not being held accountable?

              #218990
              Mustangride1
              Moderator

                Have to agree with him…..and will go further…. It was FEAR of what MIGHT happen that brought back the verdict.

                Like I keep telling people, He may well been guilty of a crime, but not the ones charged with, they did not fit the definition under the criminal code , unless there was evidence presented we are not yet aware of.  If there was then we the public should be told or at least have the media present it. If there was nothing then this was a LYNCHING. and for people who dont know a lynching is the MOB’s Wish not Justice.

                Everyone saw the tape, at first viewing it appears the officer was without doubt negligent even reckless, Count 3 yes I could agree with, but counts 1 and 2… That is the MOB, Again this is one of the fastest jury returns I can remember.

                #219004
                DigiCat
                Moderator

                  I knew the trial wouldn’t be fair because of threats and dox to the judges. It was mostly, if not guilty, riot and theft. Guilty, nothing.

                  They do realize that the riots and theft are gonna go on anyway, right?

                  #219008

                  Once the mob/rioters/loiters know they can get away with their intimitations tactics, they will now use it to CANCEL anyone who disagrees with their toxic idiology.

                  HHmm… just like the brown shorts of germany.

                Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 37 total)
                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

                Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!

                SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!

                NAVIGATION