https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/20/books/roald-dahl-books-changes.html
In a way, I wonder if this is a bit of outrage marketing, or it’s just a flex to tell the public they are going to make changes to the culture whether you like it or not. It has already been done with statues and names of schools. Again, this is not democracy. Nobody voted for this. Nobody asked for it.
It kind of flies in the face of what writing should even be about. Also, the examples given are very milquetoast and tame. They aren’t even targeting particularly edgy writers. I usually think of like a Charles Bukowski or Jim Goad, neither of which I was ever into, as examples of provocative writers.
Speaking of provocation, the public is subjected to things the don’t want to see, hear or read, for example, Sam Smith and others, so while the people are forced to see smut, the censors go after normal staples of lore and culture.
Do they even teach the classics anymore? In terms of classic literature? Larouche used to say that if one is not classical educated, one is not educated at all. That stuck with me because I don’t think I got one. Never spoke a word of Latin in my entire life.