Dissent will not be Tolerated, Russel Brand attacked by media

They don’t need any real evidence as the goal is not to jail him but just to smear his reputation so that people are driven away from him.  This is about the 5th or 6th time this has happened in the last few years to people who call it like it is and get popular.

If anyone wonders why “the machine” would attack Brand.  Here is but one example.

There is zero plot.  It’s unfounded BS until it’s not.  And they will use it to harm him financially and publicly.

“Some of the bigger names like Megyn Kelly have come out against RB claiming that the “details” of the alleged assaults which he hasn’t (as yet) directly refuted lend to their credibility.”

That’s a bunch of words that mean nothing.  She is doing the bidding of others.  Never trusted her.

“Even Georgina Baillie (who was involved in a scandal with RB) when interviewed by Piers Morgan yesterday said that while she never witnessed such behavior’s does acknowledge the allegations refer to a difficult period in his life.”

Another formation of phrases and letters that amounts to zero.

All of this is crap. There is zero chance that organically 4 women from his past 15-20 years ago got together and decide to make accusations.  Someone sought them out.  And accusations mean nothing.  Literally zero.  That is simply a smear tactic.  Just like with Trump, Kavanaugh, Carlson and Clarence Thomas.  It’s all the same.

I can sit here right now and say I was touched inappropriately by Bill Mahr, Brian Stelter, Hunter Biden and Kamala Harris at a satanic ceremony where babies were devoured.  That silly statement is no different at all than what is floating around about Brand.  The only difference is one is a media attack and the other is not.

Let’s play devils advocate.  Let’s say Russel Brand walks around his female co-workers with a huge erection Anchorman style. OK.  So, total perv.  Maybe criminal.  Does that mean his public claims about the military industrial complex and big pharma are wrong?  No.  But that’s the assumption they hope you make and THAT’S the point.

“Just like Johny Depp, they cancel culture mob is going after Russel Brand”

They seem similar but they are not.  The Depp situation was just Amber Heard being a lunatic and people/media jumping in on the entire thing partly because “men bad” and probably more so for the clicks.  During that trial even intelligent YT channels were pumping out Depp/Heard garbage daily.

The deal with Brand is a political hit job sponsored by the establishment machine and backed by their favorite propaganda tool, the mainstream media.

Yes, both are/were fabricated nonsense but one is far more insidious than the other and it’s history repeating.

How many famous men can you recall in the last 5 or so years that have had baseless accusations lobbed against them?

– Trump

– Kavanaugh

– Clarence Thomas

– Carlson

It’s interesting, they all seem to have something in common but I cannot quite put my finger on it.

• This reply was modified 7 months, 2 weeks ago by Vknid.

“If we’re honest in many cases they’re using past indiscretions to stir up trouble. It doesn’t matter how long ago it occurred, once there’s a modicum of truth they’ll twist it as needed to manipulate and rile the simpletons in their base.”

I can remember in the 80’s/90’s what politicians did was twist the truth or present a truth in a certain light.  Now truth is not even needed and total fabrication is used.  Or they do the circular logic thing where some paper writes a statement/article and all the others point to that one as proof and then the original one then points to the others as proof of itself.

Kavanaugh was an example.  Where was the truth?  That Kavanaugh went to college?  That he went to parties and had beer?

Everyone needs to understand where we are with this.  A lie can be 100% fabricated (IE Steele Dossier) and the media will in unison push it and people will believe it.

The danger is this can be done to anyone and it is.