George RR Martin sues OpenAI

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #307048
    Vknid
    Moderator

      I have been calling AI “algorithmic plagiarism” for some time now.  Why?  So I am no AI expert so lets understand that.  But from a logic standpoint (vs. a code one) all AI does (at this juncture in time) is take in data from different sources on a topic and regurgitates a hodgepodge of output tweaked slightly with some variation based on environmental or human quirks.  Maybe that is an argument for a sort of script fair use.  But to me it is no different than putting out YT videos where you react once every 10mins while you play other people’s videos.

      That is probably way over simplifying it but I think the idea AI is going to create a fresh thought is not the case (for now).  AI is more about very advanced automation based on large datasets.  I see it as more of an evolution of the Google search engine but one that is allowed to perform action.

      The point at which AI does come up with a new idea is the point it actually might become Artificial Intelligence. And this is the point as which we should be actually frightened.   For now it is just a new technology that the market pushes out as it always does with something new by trying to apply it to everything under the sun.  And of course it is new market territory so the corporate battle to claim land is on.

       

      https://www.ign.com/articles/george-r-r-martin-sue-openai-copyright-infringement

      #307053

      From the article:

      “The initial complaint, which the group of authors filed in New York’s Southern District, claims that OpenAI copied the authors’ work by using it to train its AI tools like ChatGPT without permission. This group of lauded fiction writers isn’t the first to sue OpenAI and other AI-focused businesses.”

       

      Wanna know what’s funny? Many of these authors borrowed from their predecessors. Anyone reading some of Martin’s work would find similarities to that of Tolkien’s. So should the Tolkien Estate sue Martin? Probably but they’d have a hard time proving the case.

      All of these authors who were “inspired” by the greats now want to (justifiably) cry foul when someone (or something) else is doing it to them.

      The hypocrisy is strong with this one.

    Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

    Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!

    SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!

    NAVIGATION