“The article does not mention “trans”, just “growing politicization of sport”.”
Yes, that’s called propaganda :)
(I know you know that I am just being a smartarse)
” forcing biological men (trans) by the radical extremely toxic far alt left being the “growing politicization of sport”?”
It is redundant to say “biological” man or woman. There is no other kind and using such a phrase gives credence to the thought that there is. We can use the term “trans” man or woman and that properly indicates that this is someone whom wants to try to live as the opposite sex yet we know what they really are.
This also goes for “cis”. Saying “cis” man or woman is redundant even if we accept the use of that term. All men and women are cis unless they are trans and then we refer to them as such indicating the situation.
When we need to refer to a small minority we use the descriptor for that minority and we know without that descriptor you are in the majority. There are probably something like half a million albinos in the world. Do we refer to everyone not albino, cis albino? No, because it is redundant and unneeded.
.
