Shareholder Sues Target Over ‘Billions’ Lost After Pride Campaign Backlash

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #304568

    Shareholder Sues Target Over ‘Billions’ Lost After Pride Campaign Backlash

    America First Legal (AFL), a legal activist group, sued the Target Corporation and its board of directors on behalf of a Target shareholder, alleging the company misled shareholders and lost investors billions, according to a new lawsuit.

    We need more of this.

    “Target Corporation … betrayed both Target’s core customer base of working families and its investors by making false and misleading statements concerning Target’s Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) mandates that led to its disastrous 2023 children-and-family themed LGBTQ Pride campaign,” the lawsuit reads.

    yep.

    “In its 2022 and 2023 Proxy Statements, Target assured shareholders and investors that the Board was monitoring for social and political issues and risks arising from the company’s ESG and DEI mandates. However, management only cared whether its leftist ‘stakeholders’ were satisfied,”

    So what did they do?

    “Target’s now infamous children-and-family-themed LGBT-‘Pride’ marketing and sales campaign—which embroiled Target in the culture war and caused Target to experience the biggest stock decline in the company’s history, costing investors billions,” the lawsuit continues.

    And were there not warning signs?

    Bud Light experienced a similar backlash when … trans influencer, a personalized Bud Light can and made (it) a brand ambassador, which resulted in the company losing billions.

    They knew such social and political issues in today’s marketplace is toxic (and will cost a corporation billions), and yet they did it anyway.

     

    #304571
    Vknid
    Moderator

      I have heard many people discuss that publicly owned companies who clearly decide to follow agenda instead of profit motive could be sued by their major shareholders for basically fiduciary neglect.   I have been just waiting for the first one.  Not sure this is the clearest case of it but here we are.

      Unfortunately, in my opinion, the “justice system” has lately been far more about protecting the powers that be than serving anything that even resembles justice.  Case in point the Andy Ngo trial where the lawyer for the defense openly threatened the jurors with ZERO repercussions.  Sure, that’s a super liberal area but that sets precedent.

      I doubt anything happens here of value.  I am not sure the case is even legit because I don’t know enough about it. But even if it was I have a feeling nothing will come of it.  Although, the times do seem to be changing so maybe there is some hope.

      #304601

      I’m pretty sure Disney was one of the first. They’re getting sued left and right. Yes, there are some corruption in the legal circles.

      I mean the FTC also lost lawsuits protecting big companies, so I can see the pendulum swings the other way too. Those guys just lost 25% of their budget. That lawsuit protecting playstation was a huge loss for them because they’re supposed to be protecting consumer and that was the 4th loss. Not really relevant, but it does show that they’re losing ground to protect woke companies.

       

    Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

    Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!

    SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!

    NAVIGATION