The Kenosha footage has been deleted

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 37 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #188087

    Tim Pool had the guy who captured the footage of the Rittenhouse kid defending himself on his show. dude states that Fuckerdouche deleted the vid cause it shows the truth. Fuckerdouch claims he is impartial. I say he is full of shit. Im in FB jail right fucking now cause I proved some SJW wrong with Constitutional links.

    #247459

     

     

    #247744

    Witness: Shooting victim threatened to kill him, Rittenhouse

    The first man shot by Kyle Rittenhouse on the streets of Kenosha was “hyperaggressive” that night, threatened to kill Rittenhouse, and later lunged for his rifle just before the 17-year-old fired, witnesses testified Thursday.

    And the videos all prove that too.

    The testimony at Rittenhouse’s murder trial came from two witnesses who had been called to the stand by the prosecution but gave accounts often more favorable to the defense…

    As there is no case, IMO against him.

    A wealth of video has been played in court that captured the tumultuous demonstration and the series of shootings.

    And they all show the angry mob, and how they targetted Rittenhouse, wanting to kill him…. and him running towards the police line for safety.

    And how after Rittenhouse was attacked and knocked down and hit, fearing for his life, he defended himself… and still headed for the police line for safety once he was able to get up and away from the mob.

    The evidence, IMO, is clearly one of self defense.

    #248118

     

    #248413

    An antifa member was going after Rittenhouse.

     

    #248417

    How Kyle’s trial should go:

    kyle_rittenhouse

    #248559

     

    #248612

    I am hearing more and more that since the star witnesses for the prosecutor’s case demonstrated that it was without a shadow of a doubt this was PURELY self-defense, they are doing all they can to get a mistrial, by going into arears the judge already ruled as being “out-of-bounds”.

    As this seems to be what the prosecutors wanted to do all along.

    Add to this the fact there are people who want to dox the jury and threat them with violence if they don’t return a guilty verdict on this innocent man.

    Well, the calls by the defense attorneys to have this case being “acquitted with prejudice”, as it is clearly was self-defense, and the prosecution was politically motivated (and not based on facts/evidence) before it even gets to be decided by a jury.  There is no case.  PERIOD!

    #248677

    i’ve been following the trial on rekieta law channel

    I enjoyed this part:

    ;D

    #249217

    Judge dismisses weapons charge against Kyle Rittenhouse

    The judge in Kyle Rittenhouse’s homicide trial has dismissed a misdemeanor weapons possessions charge against the teen.

    Over what?

    Prosecutors had repeatedly argued that Wisconsin’s statute was intended to prevent minors from accessing weapons, but on Monday they conceded that Rittenhouse’s rifle was not short-barreled. In his ruling, Schroeder noted that the law was poorly written.

    Poorly written or not, it did not fit the crime the prosecutors were looking for.

    Rittenhouse has pleaded not guilty to all charges, and testified that he shot all three men in self-defense because they attacked him first.

    Rittenhouse now faces five charges, including first-degree reckless homicide, first-degree intentional homicide, and attempted first-degree intentional homicide.

    It was clearly self-defense, and the prosecutors know it.

    But in this current world of agenda driven prosecutions…

    I hope a FULL acquittal of ALL charges are made.  The prosecutors did not make a “beyond a reasonable doubt” it was NOT self-defense.

    #249253

     

    #249437

    And in typical FASIST fashion, we get this:

    Damn the evidence, convict…

    “This is not a political trial,” Judge Bruce Schroeder noted laconically. It was the right thing to say, but he might as well have saved his breath for all that congressional Democrats and the grassroots Left paid attention. They care only about the result. They crave a guilty verdict so badly they can taste it.

    Because anyone not following their agenda is GUILTY, in their delusional minds.

    Getting to “guilty” and locking 18-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse away for life would help their unstinting efforts to divide the country. It would keep the creaking dirigible of “white supremacy” aloft as an apparently genuine threat to the republic. So they haven’t let the grotesque weakness of the case against Rittenhouse deflect them for a second.

    Divide and conquer.  The mentality of those at WAR.  and the left is at war with the US.

    Cynical exploitation of the Rittenhouse case is not confined to such lowlifes. It goes right to the top. President Joe Biden used images of Rittenhouse in September 2020 in a campaign video attacking former President Donald Trump…

    Can’t let any tragedy go without exploitation.

    Gross and shocking as the Left’s mendacity is, it cannot be said to be unexpected. It displays yet again something that has been clear for decades. For the umpteenth time, here are Democrats showing they care only about outcomes and don’t give a damn about the process.

    Like a tyrant.  They don’t want to follow the rule of LAW, or the processes of an independent judicial system.

    Without evidence, people are GUILTY and not allowed to be proven innocent.

    The idea that a court should administer the law rather than twist it to fit what Vice President Kamala Harris recently called “The Plan” is fuddy-duddy obscurantism to today’s Democrats. They want results and they want them now.

    Judges who are political activists, push an agenda the dems can’t get threw congress/senate.

    This is nothing less than a rejection of democracy. For democracy is not a result but a process. It is not a destination but the way we arrive there. Democracy can produce liberal or conservative policy. But liberal or conservative decisions imposed in defiance of the law, whether the criminal law (in the case of Rittenhouse) or constitutional law (as adjudicated by the Supreme Court), are no part of any properly functioning democracy.

    Correct.  Just like the dems are dems in name only.  They care not for democracy so long as they hold the power.

    The idea that results alone are important is the same as saying might makes right. It is the maxim of bullies and tyrants. It is not the political philosophy on which America long stood and should still stand.

    Or the end justify the means.

    So what if an innocent man is sent to prison for clearly shown self-defense, if that conviction can forward the means of de-arming the public, restricting one’s constitutional rights, and brings about the permanent leftist regime dreams of full blown communism.

    #249464

    From what I’ve been hearing about this kid, it sounds more like it was in self defence than anything. All he was trying to do was help people who were affected by the riots and he obviously had no choice but to act the way he did. Sadly, I think this’ll go the same way what happened to the Floyd cop because the judges will be terrified of riots if they say “not guilty”.

    #249479

    Exactly.

    Sadly the propaganda media has been doing their best spread misinformation.

    This is so clearly an innocent by self-defense case.

    #249480

     

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 37 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!

SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!

NAVIGATION