Winter War 84 Years Ago

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #310161

    On this day, exactly 84 years ago, Soviet troops invaded Finland.

    The formal reason for the start of the war was a Soviet provocation known as the Mainila incident. The Soviets claimed that on November 26, 1939, Finnish artillery in the area of Mainila fired seven shells at Soviet territory, allegedly killing four soldiers.

    Using tactics that accounted for the local climate and terrain conditions, mobile ski units that ambushed the Red Army, and relying on the Mannerheim Line, a strip of fortifications on the Karelian Isthmus, the Finns withstood the first massive Soviet offensive.

    The “Molotov cocktails” that Ukrainians used to welcome Russian convoys in 2022 got their  look and name in Finland. They made Soviet tanks burn as brightly as Russian tanks did in Ukraine decades afterwards.

    The total losses in dead and wounded on the part of the red invaders in 3 months amounted to more than 300,000 servicemen. Lacking significant support in the international community, Finland eventually had to make concessions. Nevertheless, on the battlefield, skillful Finnish soldiers demonstrated the harsh Nordic resilience, courage, and absolute devotion to their homeland.

    The Winter War is an essential lesson in military history.

    Today, just like the Finns in 1939 – 1940, Ukrainians are holding back the Moscow hordes that significantly outnumber them. As in Finland,  mobilization resources are smaller, but Ukrainians are motivated by the awareness of what they are fighting for.

    Back then, Finland managed to preserve its independence against all odds. Ukrainians intend to do the same.
    275145827_1389505994894879_5640872310051382305_n

    #310162

    2023-04-03 19.15.34

    #310163

    341517942_570050854948156_4425059018455331641_n

    #310165

    Battle of Suomussalmi

    #310171

    Another reason why Finland takes protecting Ukraine seriously, as Finland have experienced first handed the dirty tactics Russia/Soviet Union uses to justify their invasions.

    #310239
    Vknid
    Moderator

      “Another reason why Finland takes protecting Ukraine seriously, as Finland have experienced first handed the dirty tactics Russia/Soviet Union uses to justify their invasions.”

      I find demonizing only some countries is not only inaccurate but also counterproductive.

      First off, it is typically the governments of these countries doing these things and not necessarily the people themselves.  Indicting an entire people for the crimes of their governments is wrong.

      I know many folks speak to the “evil” of Russian and many do of China.  I don’t disagree with that in general but it is a mistake to think they are alone.  They are simply some of the more capable at this time.

      So here we are talking about maybe Russia will do this or that and start a war here or there.  Those are appropriate conversations to have.  But to focus on only Russia is a critical mistake.  My point being the governments of many powerful countries right now not only do as they please with the resources taken from their people but often work in concert with each other for their own self enrichment.

      How many wars/conflicts has Russia been in since 1945?  How many has the US been in?  We are focusing on Russia but others are just as much a threat.

      Do not mistake me here.  Russia could be a serious threat.  You all know I am a Christian.  There have been multiple prophecies coming from visions of Mary in Fatima specifically about Russia.  They are interesting as they say if Russia does not come to God it will do horrible things and initiate much war but if it does it will be a center for those whom believe in God.   If you are unaware of Our Lady of Fatima you probably think this sounds silly.  If you look at her words I find it most frightening.

      “When you . . . see a night illuminated by an unknown light, know that this is the great sign that He [God] is going to punish the world for its crimes, by means of war. . . .  To prevent this, I shall come to ask for the consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart. . . .  If they listen to my requests, Russia will be converted and there will be peace; if not, she will spread her errors through the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church.  The good will be martyred, the Holy Father will have much to suffer, various nations will be annihilated.”  — July 13, 1917, heard/see by Lucia dos Santos

      There is more to it than that, this is just the first bit of it.

      #310380

      I find demonizing only some countries is not only inaccurate but also counterproductive

      I have issues with many countries. But not all of them are actively trying to kill people in other countries and occupying territory.

      First off, it is typically the governments of these countries doing these things and not necessarily the people themselves.  Indicting an entire people for the crimes of their governments is wrong.

      Very true. Which is why I would wish Russians would rise up against their dictatorship, and also why I do not want Ukraine or anyone else to launch a counter attack into Russian territory unless it’s explicitly to hit military infrastructure. I’m in favour of military alliances defending each other, but not in favour of helping countries invading or attacking another country. Meaning as long as Ukraine is in a defending position, all aid and help is welcomed.

      How many wars/conflicts has Russia been in since 1945?  How many has the US been in?  We are focusing on Russia but others are just as much a threat.

      I didn’t expect such a leftist take, I’m honestly surprised. Anyway, I did a quick count and it seems like the US has been in 32 conflicts and Russia/USSR has been in 29. I didn’t read up the background on each 50+ conflicts so I may be wrong about this, but I’m pretty sure Russia has more wars which involves them directly invading other countries to gain territory, while the US has more conflict participation where they lend military aid to countries getting attacked.

      And don’t get me wrong, the US has spilled way too much innocent blood and I absolutely am against many of their conflicts. However, it could be more comparable if the US one day decided that all the Mexicans coming over the border illegally justified them to go in and bomb the shit out of northern Mexico and taking it for themselves while trying to assassinate the president and put some Johnny Smith to rule over Mexico. After that, create a mercenary group consisting of the abducted Mexicans who grew up to serve the US and send them to Canada and do the same shit there, occupying southern Canada.

      We are focusing on Russia

      Well, the thread is about Russia

      #310396
      Vknid
      Moderator

        ” have issues with many countries. But not all of them are actively trying to kill people in other countries and occupying territory.”

        That’s not a claim I made.  I simply said don’t demonize simply one country when many are guilty.  Again, country being the government not the people.

        “Very true. Which is why I would wish Russians would rise up against their dictatorship, and also why I do not want Ukraine or anyone else to launch a counter attack into Russian territory unless it’s explicitly to hit military infrastructure.”

        I would hope all countries peoples can be free and take away the powers that rule them unfairly.  Russia, UK, USA and so on.  Also, the idea you can fight a war with only surgical precision and no one else gets hurt is not reality.  War in simple definition is breaking things and killing people because all diplomacy has failed.  This idea of a half-hearted effort is why wars go on for decades.  War is horrific and should be avoided at all costs.  No different than defending yourself with a firearm.  It’s something you should only do if someone makes you.

        “I didn’t expect such a leftist take, I’m honestly surprised. Anyway, I did a quick count and it seems like the US has been in 32 conflicts and Russia/USSR has been in 29.”

        How is the truth a take that belongs to a certain “team”?  The truth is the truth, it does not have an agenda.

         

        “I didn’t read up the background on each 50+ conflicts so I may be wrong about this, but I’m pretty sure Russia has more wars which involves them directly invading other countries to gain territory, while the US has more conflict participation where they lend military aid to countries getting attacked.”

        Military Aid?  So Iraq was military aid? Afghanistan? Seriously man, you tow the line so hard for the establishment you must be on of them.

        “However, it could be more comparable if the US one day decided that all the Mexicans coming over the border illegally justified them to go in and bomb the shit out of northern Mexico”

        At least that is something that affects us directly.  Destroying Iraq on behalf of Kuwait was none of our beeswax and we did all that based on lies for self enrichment.  Which is the same reason we are in Ukraine.  Do you fall for everyone who feigns compassion but pays themselves?  Send me a check for $10,000 right now. I promise I will save many puppies and kittens.  I mean I will take 3/4 of the cash for hookers n blow and I will use the rest to kill birds but hey, compassion.

        • This reply was modified 4 months, 3 weeks ago by Vknid.
        #310425

        Happy Independence Day to Finland!

        finn-flag

        #310446

        I would hope all countries peoples can be free and take away the powers that rule them unfairly.  Russia, UK, USA and so on

        Of course there are things to criticize about them all, I am strongly against the monarchy in the UK and have many problems with the USA, one being the conflicts they participate in. I am not however counting up all their faults in a thread about Russia’s involvement in conflict.

        How is the truth a take that belongs to a certain “team”?  The truth is the truth, it does not have an agenda.

        oh I know, which is why I am positively surprised since a lot of people I have discussed with here pick their team and argue based on that.

        Military Aid?  So Iraq was military aid? Afghanistan? Seriously man, you tow the line so hard for the establishment you must be on of them.

        I did not mention those two. But as far as I know, the Korean war was rationaled with South Koreans needing aid against the invasion from the north supported by the USSR and China. The war on terror was a shitshow with a lot of lies used to justify, but the rationale of eliminating a terrorist organization who actually actively caused damage on your own soil was more logically consistent, but it was such a small fraction of what occured in reality that it went down the toilet.

        But I think one of the major differences is that every country around or in proximity to the US don’t need to be worried whether they are going to get invaded or sabotaged at any moment.

        At least that is something that affects us directly.  Destroying Iraq on behalf of Kuwait was none of our beeswax and we did all that based on lies for self enrichment.

        Somehow I feel like that would not be a great idea. Doing that would put more of your own people at danger, if you decide to bring the war to your own doorstep.

        Which is the same reason we are in Ukraine.

        But you aren’t. In Ukraine it’s inly Ukrainians and voluntarily soldiers with boots on the ground.

        Do you fall for everyone who feigns compassion but pays themselves?  Send me a check for $10,000 right now. I promise I will save many puppies and kittens.  I mean I will take 3/4 of the cash for hookers n blow and I will use the rest to kill birds but hey, compassion.

        I would dare to say letting Russia occupy Ukraine would be a greater threat in the future. Ukraine didn’t even have a proper military until 2014, and they are up against a super power. If they waste the aid they get and lose because of that then it’s kinda their own fault. But I do believe pushing Russia out is crucial, because if they succeed without the west reacting in any way, they’ll just gather strength for 10 years and roll out to get another country after that

        #310529
        Vknid
        Moderator

          “Of course there are things to criticize about them all, I am strongly against the monarchy in the UK and have many problems with the USA, one being the conflicts they participate in. I am not however counting up all their faults in a thread about Russia’s involvement in conflict.”

          Well good we agree.  Although the monarchy is the UK is just a feckless spectacle.  It’s their government that oppresses them so.  And yes, the USA has indeed enflamed the world often with conflict that did not always need to be.  Again, we agree.   I am not counting faults either.  My entire point is demonizing 1 country is an overemphasis that detracts from a global situation where there is not just 1 demon.

          “oh I know, which is why I am positively surprised since a lot of people I have discussed with here pick their team and argue based on that.”

          This unfortunately seems to be human nature.  It’s something that is preyed upon by those whom wish to control people.  It takes a lot of effort to not fall to that. But since you seem to bang the drum of every leftist tenant I will say ,to this point, you are the thing you complain about.

          “But as far as I know, the Korean war was rationaled with South Koreans needing aid against the invasion from the north supported by the USSR and China. The war on terror was a shitshow with a lot of lies used to justify, but the rationale of eliminating a terrorist organization who actually actively caused damage on your own soil was more logically consistent, but it was such a small fraction of what occured in reality that it went down the toilet.

          But I think one of the major differences is that every country around or in proximity to the US don’t need to be worried whether they are going to get invaded or sabotaged at any moment.”

          I am honestly not sure a military action has ever been aid in modern history.   That’s more of a question than a statement. Most often horrible things done have always had appealing names to disguise the actual thing.

          The war on terror (again a nice name) was a sh!tshow.  Agreed.  Did it maybe do some good? I had heard there were positives.  But it seemed mostly to be about feeding money from the tax coffers to lots of other people.  And I am not aware of any terrorist organization that was actually eliminated.   I actually challenge the effectiveness or the righteousness of invading a country in the name of self-defense when that country is half a world away.

          “But you aren’t. In Ukraine it’s inly Ukrainians and voluntarily soldiers with boots on the ground.”

          Even though you and I just agreed on the crap show and wrongness that was prior “aid”  or military intervention you still think the west’s involvement in Ukraine is altruistic. You really must trust the people who tell you what’s “right”.

          I guess if we used the propaganda mechanism of limiting a definition so as to sway an argument disingenuously you might be right.  But involvement in military conflict is not relegated to just boots on the ground.  The west (especially the US) is sending billions of cash and billions in weapons.  Do you really think that is for the common good of Ukraine?  Or is it a new place to launder money given the other wars have concluded?

          And if you think there is not military from the US there then I don’t know what to tell you.  That’s already been proven to be the case.  You would say well they are not on the frontline.  I hardly think that makes a difference.

          And what you are stating that it’s just volunteers and Ukrainians, seems silly to me.  That is also somewhat misleading as I understand it Ukraine was conscribing people into their military. But in any case, while good numbers are hard to find, the Russian forces dwarf the Ukrainian forces. At war time the Ukrainians had an active force of about 200k and Russian about 1.5 million.  Those numbers have changed since but that’s about where it started. So the idea that the Ukraine is defending the pass at Thermopylae against Xerxes is possible, but highly unlikely.  I find it far more likely that much we hear about something we cannot see is probably lies and what actually goes on is far different.

          #310794

          It takes a lot of effort to not fall to that. But since you seem to bang the drum of every leftist tenant I will say ,to this point, you are the thing you complain about.

          I pulled away from the right wing after joining this forum actually. I used to gobble up Crowder, Shapiro etc until I noticed how much lies they are spewing. Another factor was I noticed that people on the far right are just as batshit crazy as far left people, mainly from people on this forum. I re-evaluated my stance on many topics, but my views certainly don’t line up with leftists either. I oppose socialism, I think leftists in general have horrible foreign policy takes (Israel-Palestine conflict being one example) and so on. I would consider myself a liberal social democrat, by no means a leftist or socialist.

          The war on terror (again a nice name) was a sh!tshow.  Agreed.  Did it maybe do some good? I had heard there were positives.  But it seemed mostly to be about feeding money from the tax coffers to lots of other people.  And I am not aware of any terrorist organization that was actually eliminated.   I actually challenge the effectiveness or the righteousness of invading a country in the name of self-defense when that country is half a world away.

          on paper it sounded nice, counter attack against a terrorist force that fucked up your country. The US would have looked really weak if they hadn’t reacted in any way, showing that terrorists can just slip in and cause mayhem without repercussion. But yeah it went truly south.

          you still think the west’s involvement in Ukraine is altruistic.

          I do yeah. If no one reacted to Nazi Germany’s bullshit things could have gone very different. With no involvement or military aid, smaller countries would just be consumed by larger ones. China would have probably already taken Taiwan and who knows what other countries. Russia is pretty good at sticking needles to see how far they can go before they meet resistance. Even in Finland now they have been testing the limits by infrastructure sabotage and now the refugee thing on the border. Without any guarantee of military assitance like NATO or the Nordic Alliance, who knows what Russia would do.

          The west (especially the US) is sending billions of cash and billions in weapons.  Do you really think that is for the common good of Ukraine?

          it has proved to be useful, yes. Ukraine has pretty poor artillery force, and the HIMARS rockets provided have been a lifesaver for Ukraine in both defensive and offensive strategy due to their long range, helping Ukraine destroy ammo and other military equipment storages. Assistance in airforce weaponry is also crucial due to Ukraine’s pretty much non-existent airforce capability, as Russia has not been able to take over the air which was crucial in for example defending the capital Kiev when Russia was hunting for Zelenskiy during the opening stages.

           

          #310795

          And what you are stating that it’s just volunteers and Ukrainians, seems silly to me.  That is also somewhat misleading as I understand it Ukraine was conscribing people into their military.

          Sorry I might have been careless with my words. What I meant was there are only foreign volunteers in Ukraine, adding to the conscribed Ukrainian people. So basically, Ukrainians and foreign volunteers, meaning no country has sent their own troops to Ukraine but volunteers from countries all over the world has joined.

          #310799

          SuperSoynic, what you say about pulling away from the right wing is exactly what happened to me when the lock downs started! I saw so much bullshit from people who were supposed to my “allies” that I decided to distance myself from everything and I knew I did the right thing when the full-scale invasion of Ukraine began.

          In the last three years I have heard the most retarded, baffling takes from the dissident right such as

          • shilling for Stalinist Russia
          • shilling for islam and the islamic conquest of Europe
          • shilling for chinese Communism
          • trying to ally with “based” communists
          • calling people anti-white because they don’t support Palestinians or some african tribal conflict
          • saying that they want hostile foreign civilisations to conquer and destroy our own
          • celebrating terrorist attacks
          • supporting lock downs because it’s “based” and will put leftists in their place
          • supporting vaccine mandates
          • You don’t like communist china? Then you must be a pawn of globohomo
          • You’re against russian war crimes in Ukraine? You must be anti-white because putin’s islamic orcs are a punch against globohomo

            The dissident right has been infested by third-worldist duginist ideas leading us into the same destruction the left does, if not worse in some cases.
            Dugin believes in causing as much chaos in foreign countries as possible, symbolized by his emblem, the satanic chaos star sigil. These days right wingers seem to busy to redeem communism and forge alliances with “based muslims” who will conquer Europe and punch globohomo, while at the same time trivialising muslim terrorist attacks and war crimes in Ukraine. That piece of shit Mark Collet literally said Russia murdering Ukrainians is a “poke in the eye to the US government”. I keep the video in my Ukraine archive for any retarded supporters of his who donate their hard-earned money to this loser. IuDGdy1

          #310837

          @Strider yeah it was during the lockdown and covid era I distanced myself too, I originally joined this forum at that time to talk about geek culture and some politics, laughing at far left lunatics but I quickly realized that this forum was full of people I thought was batshit crazy talking about how Trump is Jesus reincarnated while Biden is possessed by Satan’s soul, how vaccines have 5G micro chips that will turn people into zombies (still waiting for that) and some people calling black people animals. The final straw was the January 6th when they flipflopped between the incident being justified and based but also it was the CIA and Antifa and they should be locked up, but when the people got locked up it switched again to being unfair because what happened was cool and justified.

          shilling for Stalinist Russia
          shilling for islam

          I find this one interesting, it’s actually called the horseshoe theory, where the further you go to to the left or right, the more your views actually start to align with each other, but often for different reasons.

          When supporting Russia, far left people justify it often becasue they just take the opposite position of what the USA or the west has, Hasan Piker being an example of this. They also celebrate the communism China and the USSR practices, and favor those countries for that.

          Far right people often side with Russia because Russia is ”fighting against western woke mind virus” and oppose LGBT stuff.

          Same goes for islam, the far left simp muslim societies becasue they believe muslims are oppressed by the evil white people and have to defend islamic states.

          Similarly, the far right which traditionally tends to be islamophobic have been increasingy supported islamic states, especially after the rise of the redpill movement with prominent figures like Andrew Tate and Sneako converting to islam. The reason seems to be similar to the Russia stuff, they see how in islamic cultures it’s okay to beat up women and restrict their rights and gay people get executed and they think ”wow, they oppose feminism and woke LGBT agenda. This is actually based”

        Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
        • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

        Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!

        SIGN UP FOR UPDATES!

        NAVIGATION