EU to Musk – “in Europe the Bird will fly by our rules”

You all have to remember, the EU has a “Right to be forgotten” law.

In Article 17, the GDPR outlines the specific circumstances under which the right to be forgotten applies. An individual has the right to have their personal data erased if: The personal data is no longer necessary for the purpose an organization originally collected or processed it.

I am sure twatter will have to obey those rules and regulations as well as other digital platforms that operate in the EU.

Of course, that only applies within the EU… for now.

Twatter is reported it losses $4MillionUSD per day.

The people he “fired” friday were given 3 months severance, and not the 90 days as required my law.

And alot of those braindead were indeed fired friday.

It is also being reported that the narcisists that have the blue checkmark, not only have to pay the price of one coffee per month to keep it, but that once the BOTs have been removed from their sub counts, the number of followers will be half if not less than what they have now.

It’s just kinda ironic that who say ”don’t ruin our stuff, make your own instead!”

I think you have it backwards.  The left have been saying, if you don’t like it, build your own.  Don’t ruin our echo chamber.  They are the ones now crying that they have to share the public place with views and facts and reality.  No, the leftist mob on twatter is NOT celebrating.  Their communist control of thought on twatter is going to be over.

People sharing and planning attacks via twatter, hopefully will now be banned.

Hate speech will still be banned, but the definition will be more refined.  “I don’t think biological males pretending to be females should be competing against biological females in female sports.”  That is an opinion and should be allowed.

That is NOT hate speech.  That is an honest opinion.  If you disagree with it, that is your right as a free individual.  But to call it HATE and want it banned because you disagree with my opinion, well you are the one demonstrating the HATE, not me or whomever shared that opinion.

Let us be 100% Honest here.

Speech is protected PERIOD with very limited exceptions. Those exception may well result in the person saying it being Sued or Charged with a crime, but they are very defined and clearly articulated and the burden is very high in what must be proved.

Justice Samuel Alito wrote in this unanimous decision. “The proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express ‘the thought that we hate,’” he said, quoting the 1929 dissent from Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes.

“The danger of viewpoint discrimination,” Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in The Slants’ case, “is that the government is attempting to remove certain ideas or perspectives from a broader debate. That danger is all the greater if the ideas or perspectives are ones a particular audience might think offensive, at least at first hearing. To permit viewpoint discrimination in this context is to permit government censorship.”

Hate speech is an opinion by-enlarge at this point and not what it truly use to be. I know what true hate speech is and IT is PROTECTED by the Constitution. Elon should let all speech that is not a violation of Law exist on the platform and let the chips fall where they will and the true character of a person shine though.

How about $15,000 for a blue checkmark?  Twitter employees did that… privately